johnwang wrote:To prevent a problem from happening is much easier than to allow a problem to happen and then try to fix it. This sound like a common sense to me but some Judo population look down upon the "grip fight" for some unknown reason that I cannot figure out.
I agree, I've heard judoka complain that a lot of the matches at the Olympics just turned into grip fighting as if that were a bad thing.
In fact Judo recently made it a rule that you can't grip the pants. On top of that if you hold an unorthodox grip and nothing happens in 5 seconds the ref will penalize you.
This is one thing I like about Sambo (and BJJ stand-up), they don't have all these rules about grips. My favorite judo comes from Europe or more specifically Russia because they embrace grip fighting.
Here's a quote from the Judo Masterclass book "Grips" by Neil Adams on the subject.
The traditional Japanese view looks at grips in terms of hikite (the main pull, which is generally the sleeve grip) and tsurite (the drawing hand, which is generally the lapel grip). Typically, the words carry their own special image which mirrors the action: tsurite, for example, comes from the Japanese word tsuri, to fish, and incorporates the idea of drawing an opponent off balance, just as a fishing rod bends when it draws a fish out of the water.
The modern view of unorthodox attacks typified by the Russian style approaches grips in a very different way. Anything within the rules has become not just acceptable but almost the norm, and there is now a bewildering array of attacking grips, defensive grips and tactical grips in use.