by Bodywork on Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:06 am
Hi Tom
I guess I have a different idea of soft and hard, or maye the same idunno, -here's what I think
I guess I would characterize what I do as soft training in the sense that it requires standing practice, and chi gongs as most would call them, to connect the body in specific ways. Then moving energy through the body with a balance of opposing energies while moving-done in solo exercises. Then, on to moving against force doing the same things you practiced alone while maintaining a balance of forces within you. With the sole intent of maintaining these forces in lue of your opponent being able to break the connections. Your body begins moves through a range of resistive forces while maintaining its central balance undisturbed. The effect of this initial training creates any manner of effects on an opponent putting energy into you trying to throw you or strike you; sticky drawing-in, cancellations of forces, as the may happen from your opponent, on to your own choices to move from power moves to throw, with the ability to transfer substantial weight without dedicating it. Due to the connections being created within the body the ability to strike (which I agree seems extremely hard and sharp) is actually extremely soft in feel inside the one doing it. More important is later training where a soft body feels and moves forces, senses and displaces directed force without needing to do whole hell of a lot to do so. IMO most MAers carry their weight in dedicated one side moves that expose them to throws and counters, and the way they hit- in a boxing style or MT style- makes them more open for takedowns. Anyway, to clarify I consider the training method very soft in application, mentally hard to do-even exhausting, then physically difficult to hold the focus of connections together. However those same connections produce a feel in the body like hard rubber in motion or sharp angular attacks in feel, but all recognizably soft-even to a few ICMA masters who commented on my "feel."
Where that interacts with rolling and banging is still not "hard" to me, even though it can be strenouos when we go out to varous other places to play or have people come here. Never do we change what we are doing on the inside, yet muscle driven grapplers frequesntly comment on how "hard" or strong we feel, as they can't see or understand what that "feel" is from.
We have had fun playing with other grapplers from all different arts. It is for this reason that I was looking for similar types training in ICMA but more importantly men who can do more than talk about it, but actually be able to deliver and use what they know against serious resistance, and how they felt about a universal tie-in to grappling. I would find the methods they were using, and their understanding of them in use very interesting. I really wasn't intending to talk and share an understanding with a guy who trains solo in his garage and what he thinks of say, the use of taiji in grappling.
I know there are more of me out there; I am hoping to be able to meet some. If not, then at least talk with some who are interested in the same ideas in pursuits of their own training. I'm not interested in arguing with people who doubt there is a tie-in potential, more in sharing with like minded men.
Last edited by Bodywork on Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:13 am, edited 2 times in total.