gretel wrote:i also like to try to understand the martial focus of the movements, why it is at heart a martial art.
That is the position a great many tjq practitioners worldwide find themselves in--wondering about the martial part. I think the martial usage part validates and confirms the angles and body forces involved in the movements, much as some actual experience with nails would help you understand the function of a hammer. So I have found it very frustrating that so few people are willing to offer me a clue on this part--either not having one to share, or not wanting to...whatever.
Still there is a benefit in the movements themselves, and that is what most of the world taiji community has bought into. Having argued elsewhere for free markets and personal judgment, it would be hypocritical if I said the world taiji for health thing has gotten off on the wrong foot--that taiji consumers did not choose the right thing to buy. Who am I to say?
But what will the movements look like, after a couple generations of non-martial teachers and students who become teachers in turn? Will the movements themselves be recognizable?
But, anyhow, I think it's good that this excellent exercise is so widely known now, not only in China and the East, but much of the West too.