DeusTrismegistus wrote:What do you mean by qi monism or qi dualism?
IMAS wrote:DeusTrismegistus wrote:What do you mean by qi monism or qi dualism?
As I practice the hunyuan posture I can feel the energy between my palms. As I practice Qigong healing I can sense energy gone out of me. Maybe we can call this energy Qi. In practical terms, the monistic view is that yin qi and yang qi are two ends of a continuum from very weak (yin) to very strong (yang) for example, and the dualistic view is that yin qi and yang qi are two separate entities trying to reach some sort of harmony.
IMAS wrote:DeusTrismegistus wrote:What do you mean by qi monism or qi dualism?
As I practice the hunyuan posture I can feel the energy between my palms. As I practice Qigong healing I can sense energy gone out of me. Maybe we can call this energy Qi. In practical terms, the monistic view is that yin qi and yang qi are two ends of a continuum from very weak (yin) to very strong (yang) for example, and the dualistic view is that yin qi and yang qi are two separate entities trying to reach some sort of harmony.
DeusTrismegistus wrote: Just because something is yin does not mean it is weak and just because something is yang does not mean it is strong. Water is yin and it can change the very face of the earth. What else has that strength?
Instead of thinking of it in terms of what the qi is, weak/strong, yang/yin; why don't you think about it in terms of what the qi is doing?
IMAS wrote:I am thinking of qi as a continuum from yin to yang, a monistic view. When it is divided into the primal elements of water, fire, sky and earth, these elements can also be somewhere in the yin yang continuum.


Bao wrote:IMAS wrote:I am thinking of qi as a continuum from yin to yang, a monistic view. When it is divided into the primal elements of water, fire, sky and earth, these elements can also be somewhere in the yin yang continuum.
Qi wasn't divided into the elements.
Damn, you mix things up. Are you interested in the philosophical thoeries or how to think about qi for actual practice? Get your thoughts sorted up properly and ask accordingly.
IMAS wrote:DeusTrismegistus wrote: Just because something is yin does not mean it is weak and just because something is yang does not mean it is strong. Water is yin and it can change the very face of the earth. What else has that strength?
Instead of thinking of it in terms of what the qi is, weak/strong, yang/yin; why don't you think about it in terms of what the qi is doing?
You classified water as yin but it can transform from weak to strong. Your classification is dualistic and then saying yin can be yin and yang which is a monistic view.
I am thinking of qi as a continuum from yin to yang, a monistic view. When it is divided into the primal elements of water, fire, sky and earth, these elements can also be somewhere in the yin yang continuum.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests