Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Discussion on the three big Chinese internals, Yiquan, Bajiquan, Piguazhang and other similar styles.

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Shooter on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:47 pm

gzregorz wrote:I've seen you on this board and the different incarnations of it for well over 10 years now and I've always respected your opinion. my screen name has changed but thats neither here nor there, but to try to insult people and call them spoonfed for seeking out quality instruction in the art of their choice just wrong. using your logic we should all go on the garage and create our own systems.

btw, i don't think anyone has suggested that you should believe the hype. I certainly don't.


Please understand that I am not against any one seeking out quality instruction. Not in the least. What I am against is the lack of insight and imagination some people have shown - for years - whenever the topic of creating and discovering good martial art on one's own comes up. They demonstrate their ignorance of the process over and over again and it's pretty clear that they can't appreciate or even recognize the methodologies that both cultivate and facilitate that process. The fact that those people may or may not be getting 'quality instruction' has nothing to do with them being spoonfed.

Spoonfed is a state of mind that I already described in my last post - the state of mind of someone that believes the hype. Again, it has nothing to do with whether or not they're getting quality instruction. It's their inability/unwillingness to accept that it can be done any other way but through 'quality instruction'. Their inability to understand that good martial art is nothing new under the sun, and that it's there for the discovery if proper training methods and practices are followed. Spoonfed don't even know what those methods are and can't appreciate them because they've never allowed themselves to experience the methods and practices in the context of martial art.

Spoonfed are those who read through a drill posted here and then ask questions about why this or that is done, instead of just doing the drill, whereupon, those questions are moot. Lots of other examples and reasons for the judicious use of the term. ;D
Last edited by Shooter on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
there's more than one way up the hill - Nov/27/09
Shooter
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:40 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby gzregorz on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:52 pm

Fair enough, thanks for explaining where you're coming from. I can see what you're saying now, that this should be encouraged instead of questioned.
"You don't have to be great to start, but you have to start to be great." -Saul Escalera
User avatar
gzregorz
Wuji
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:45 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Shooter on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:53 pm

And the respect is mutual, btw
there's more than one way up the hill - Nov/27/09
Shooter
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:40 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby gzregorz on Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:28 pm

Good times.
"You don't have to be great to start, but you have to start to be great." -Saul Escalera
User avatar
gzregorz
Wuji
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:45 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby cdobe on Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:02 pm

You're all wong...
cdobe
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:34 am

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby jonathan.bluestein on Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:32 pm

Didn't someone say that we might actually get a response from master Wong here? That could be quite interesting...
"Skill is acquired through continuous practice, sophistication & depth are achieved by giving thought to it" - the words of my teacher.
User avatar
jonathan.bluestein
Wuji
 
Posts: 2560
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:44 pm
Location: Israel

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby liokault on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:17 pm

Would we be having this discussion if the question was " who is this master Smith"?
liokault
Great Old One
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:00 am

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Shooter on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:27 pm

cdobe wrote:You're all wong...


Yeah, it would seem so.

As I already admitted, I've been delusional on this forum since I got here and have had certain folks remind of that from time to time over the years, and all the while those same folks have been doing the real, authentic fighty cma. Doesn't matter that they've changed their tune like I change jackets (seasonally and without thought as to how it looks).

I just keep saying the same shit over and over and continue to be deluded. Isn't that a sign of insanity or some such? Maybe I shoulda meditated more all those years ago and that insanity could havel be prevented...or so says Gary. Don't bother me, I'm talking to myself

Man, I luv this forum
Last edited by Shooter on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
there's more than one way up the hill - Nov/27/09
Shooter
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:40 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Bao on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:28 pm

liokault wrote:Would we be having this discussion if the question was " who is this master Smith"?


There has been discussions similar to this before. Montague, BKF, Cheng Man Ching and others. I think that Mr should feel honored to get so much attention here. :D
Thoughts on Tai Chi (My Tai Chi blog)
- Storms make oaks take deeper root. -George Herbert
- To affect the quality of the day, is the highest of all arts! -Walden Thoreau
User avatar
Bao
Great Old One
 
Posts: 2528
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:46 am
Location: High up north

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby liokault on Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:00 pm

Bao wrote:
liokault wrote:Would we be having this discussion if the question was " who is this master Smith"?


There has been discussions similar to this before. Montague, BKF, Cheng Man Ching and others. I think that Mr should feel honored to get so much attention here. :D



Sorry, I think I made my point badly.

I was questioning wether we would even be considering this if he were not chinese.
Last edited by liokault on Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
liokault
Great Old One
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:00 am

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby cdobe on Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:49 am

Shooter wrote:
cdobe wrote:You're all wong...


Yeah, it would seem so.

As I already admitted, I've been delusional on this forum since I got here and have had certain folks remind of that from time to time over the years, and all the while those same folks have been doing the real, authentic fighty cma. Doesn't matter that they've changed their tune like I change jackets (seasonally and without thought as to how it looks).

I just keep saying the same shit over and over and continue to be deluded. Isn't that a sign of insanity or some such? Maybe I shoulda meditated more all those years ago and that insanity could havel be prevented...or so says Gary. Don't bother me, I'm talking to myself

Man, I luv this forum

It was just a cheesy joke, there is no need for anyone to take it personal.
cdobe
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:34 am

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Shooter on Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:50 am

cdobe wrote:
Shooter wrote:
cdobe wrote:You're all wong...


Yeah, it would seem so.

As I already admitted, I've been delusional on this forum since I got here and have had certain folks remind of that from time to time over the years, and all the while those same folks have been doing the real, authentic fighty cma. Doesn't matter that they've changed their tune like I change jackets (seasonally and without thought as to how it looks).

I just keep saying the same shit over and over and continue to be deluded. Isn't that a sign of insanity or some such? Maybe I shoulda meditated more all those years ago and that insanity could havel be prevented...or so says Gary. Don't bother me, I'm talking to myself

Man, I luv this forum

It was just a cheesy joke, there is no need for anyone to take it personal.


Not personal at all. Was just adding some whine to that cheese 8-)
there's more than one way up the hill - Nov/27/09
Shooter
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:40 pm

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Doc Stier on Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:44 am

Image

A chip to go with the whine and cheese! ;D
"First in the Mind and then in the Body."
User avatar
Doc Stier
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4059
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:04 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Doc Stier on Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:15 pm

Image

On a more serious note, everyone starts exactly where they already are. Some guys (and gals) are natural fighters and seem to be able to make a good fight without having formally learned anything. Unfortunately, that wasn't me. I learned through hard experience early on that I needed some kind of instruction in order acquire enough skill to get the job done when necessary. The choices were few, so quality of instruction wasn't much of a consideration. In 1961, guys felt lucky to find any kind of martial art instruction at all. I'll bet that's still true even today in many places. :-\

As more teachers of different styles appeared, I explored various arts until I found what seemed to best suit my physical attributes and temperament, and stuck with each one long enough to know for sure. My greatest claim was that I never quit learning and training. I just kept going, long after my curiosity was satisfied and even after realizing it was going to be a lot of hard work to succeed. To describe the training offered by Asian masters in those days as "eating bitter" would be a vast understatement! :o

Nonetheless, as time passed in training, and my fighting experience increased, it became clear in every style or system I studied that certain techniques and tactics weren't ever going to be my best for one reason or another. I think this is a common experience for most people in the martial arts. As a result, I had to take the basic material I received from each instructor and teach myself how to make it work best for me. If I couldn't do that, screw the hype, I moved on to something else that might be a better fit for me, either physically or mentally or both. I suspect that this is how existing styles are always modified, sometimes changing enough to become a separate, new style altogether. If that process effectively meets an individual's needs, it would be foolish not to do so, right? -shrug-

That being said, however, I question the wisdom in trying to create a new style or system of fighting without first acquiring a basic expertise in something to use as a jumping off point of logical departure. Otherwise, there's a good chance that what you perceive as lacking in some styles may already be there, but is simply yet to be discovered due to insufficent training time and experience. Instead, I see lots of guys learning a bit of this style and a little of that style, usually not beyond an intermediate level of skill in each, and then blending it all together as their own new style of "mixed martial arts'. And of course, they modestly present themselves as the Founder and Grandmaster of same. LOL ;D

Really? Seriously? ::)

So, it's certainly not necessary to reinvent the wheel, but it's also not necessary to trudge along indefinitely, trying to fit square pegs into round holes! -oldman-
Last edited by Doc Stier on Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"First in the Mind and then in the Body."
User avatar
Doc Stier
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4059
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:04 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Who is this 'Master Wong'?

Postby Shooter on Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:45 pm

A chip? With fine whine and subtle cheese? How gauche!
there's more than one way up the hill - Nov/27/09
Shooter
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 2:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], pennsooner and 4 guests