taijicannon wrote:push their arms down to pin it against them and gain a measure of control over their bodies ...
chimerical tortoise wrote:1. The big fist is very functionally similar to the 'wedge' or tan/bong/fook strategy from VT, is it not? In VT, linking the hands to create the big fist is a very useful way of keeping forward intent and maintaining structure by creating a shape that can make it easier to go forward and not to lift up, push down, or push sideways. After using this sort of 'wedge' for awhile in sticky hands, most people find it is also easier to maintain the same without the hands linked.
2. Head motion: I noticed that there is a bit of forward head motion in the first clip. Is this to do with setting up to applying throws/takedowns?
3. Unbalancing on contact. Is it possible by using the "big fist" to unbalance your opponent on first contact?
3. I assume it's possible if strike hard enough. It's mainly form "close the distance". The main purpose of this strategy is to change a striking game into a grappling game ASAP.
chimerical tortoise wrote:What do you feel that using such a head-on strategy may offer that a more ''yielding'', ''soft'' or ''absorbing'' strategy (like what is more preferred by taiji or bagua)?
Ralteria wrote:Would it make more sense to NOT interlace the fingers? Just keep the fists closed with the thumbs on top and press your fingers together. The big fist with fingers interlaced seems vulnerable. The first thing I would want to do is grab the fist and squeeze my opponents fingers together.
Just pressing the fists together would keep that from happening and make it much quicker to separate when you want to grab.
Just a thought.
johnwang wrote:Ralteria wrote:Would it make more sense to NOT interlace the fingers? Just keep the fists closed with the thumbs on top and press your fingers together. The big fist with fingers interlaced seems vulnerable. The first thing I would want to do is grab the fist and squeeze my opponents fingers together.
Just pressing the fists together would keep that from happening and make it much quicker to separate when you want to grab.
Just a thought.
The interlock fingers is only the beginner level training. The fingers locking is not necessary.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests