GrahamB wrote:Today's epiphany is tomorrow's half truth...
WVMark wrote:If we talk about theory, this made a lot more sense to me:
http://brennantranslation.wordpress.com ... ji-da-wen/
everything wrote:have you ever done this experiment: you have teams with an egg, some straws, strings, popsicle sticks, and perhaps some similar materials. each team engineers and builds a structure around your egg. then you have a contest in which each structure and egg is dropped from a certain height. the winner is the team whose egg does not break.
the key to a good structure is to basically build a sphere around the egg. the sphere takes the impact force and disperses and/or moves that focal point (probably there is some rolling on impact) we are talking about so the egg doesn't take that force and doesn't break. plus it's hard to break the egg because it too has the nice round shape. I don't know the exact physics but I think that's what you're trying to get at, right? I don't know if it's the "solution" but it certainly makes sense.
XiaoXiong wrote:The steps that cross the center set up a lot of circles and emptiness such as stealing step,
XiaoXiong wrote:It is a dynamic sphere, ... to lead into emptiness.
XiaoXiong wrote:I totally agree with you on this John. In fact that very same move is the very first thing that clued me in to leading into emptiness. It is done in external and internal arts. Especially sword stuff for instance. The only difference in internal and external is the method and theory gets more into the mind body connection and a certain relaxation and refined understanding of Jing. I think to be honest that the internal and external monakers make very little sense in the end. It's just a different approach to the same subject, but also with different results. It's not important though.
Jess
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: Trick, twocircles13 and 104 guests