kenneth fish wrote:I believe what you are trying to say is that this sort of practice elicits sympathetic reactions which produce these effects.
mixjourneyman wrote:respectfully noted.
however, the original poster asked about something which is not clearly an anatomical feature of the body.
if he had asked how to use the pelvic floor or something less ephemeral than elixir field, then the question may not have strayed so far into the nether regions of buddha's butt crack ><
Tom wrote:It's early days in this area.
Tom wrote:mixjourneyman wrote:this whole breaking chinese martial arts down into an exact western physical science is total hokum, as the terminology used to describe physical processes in ancient chinese language and modern western language are as different as night and day.
the point rests that the dantian is not a collection of muscles in any practice other than the minds of a few martial artists.
I think the key point you make in this statement--and please correct me if it's not what you meant to say--is "terminology used to describe physical processes." Fine, modern Western language differs from ancient Chinese language in this respect. But if dantian is a physical process--e.g., pattern of muscle/fascial usage--then the different terminology isn't that critical. If dantian is a physical process then it can be trained by physical practice.
But in perusing past pages of this thread I don't think you are saying this exactly.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests