by Niall Keane on Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:58 am
thanks folks,
Cloudz, I believe in the british seizing legs is permitted, I've checked with Dan on this. The European rules therefore reflect this format, not unlike ICBAs either. The more restricted TCFE moving step caters for groups who wanted a "safer" format. One can read in to this based on past experience.
thanks for the info on the London comp!
Marian, do you have any contact details or links to notice boards to any of those comps you mentioned?
Dan, it is true there is frustration in my words, born form remembering my days as a competitor and turning up in good faith only to find out the rules on the day and finding more often than not that they were fixed to favour the host teams approach. We all in CMA know and have experienced this BS.
I find the idea of having people travel to an event called tuishou and then providing a format unrecognisable to most as bit of a con really. And the vagueness of rules seems to suit such cheaters. Also using TCC jargon as rules - say for example "peng lu ji an" o.k. well in my style "peng" means upward force, so an uppercut is also an expression of peng. Is it o.k. for me to uppercut my opponent? How about "jow" ? so its cool to cut my opponent's eyebrow with my elbow then? right? or knee him in the ribs? my style Jow is elbows and forearms and knees and shins! well that's what the rules say? OH!!!! you mean "the promoters understanding" of peng lu ji an? Jargon fails every time!
The idea of posting CLEAR rules and contact details for regular events or organisations who host such, enables the promoters to advertise which is surely to their benefit, and also offers a transparency for coaches and athletes considering entering. Win Win I would assume? this forum being popular amongst many IMA styles would seem the perfect place to do so surely?
I cannot fathom any benefit for the honest promoter or the potential athlete for competitions to lay hidden, and rules to be vague and applied for by the athlete or coach. Or better still only thoroughly "explained" at a meeting before the matches begin. Every successful combat sport promotion in the world share their rules openly and have relevant info posted.
Look at MMA, which doesn’t have universal rules either, and how they share such info, it allows them to decide what to train for, are they ready for head-shots? do they want kicks to a downed opponent? etc.etc. It allows athletes and their coaches to "programme" and schedule their combat experience and it even allows the "fans" time to plan to attend events they want to see.
Experience equals proficiency, before the ICBA in Ireland there were no Sanda or Tuishou comps, I and a few others had to fight abroad for experience. Only a handful ever did this. Stepping up to international competition in the first outing can be a nervous experience! the vast majority of CMA in Ireland didn't and consequently they couldn't kick snow off a rope. they did pretty forms though! When we started running comps the level of skill was abysmal bar my own students who had plenty of international experience. And they felt obliged to turn up as I was one of the organisers even though for them it was I'll admit a total waste of time - no challenge at all. Now 7 years later the ICBA has EWUF membership, runs 5 national opens a year and this year at the Europeans against 32 other countries another school (YMAA) came back with medals. That's progress!
Its the same reason Muay Thai and MMA lads are generally way ahead in fighting skills than typical CMA lads, they get the experience and practice through comps every 6 weeks or so, sometimes more frequently. Its not rocket science. Practice equals proficiency! In my opinion CMA and IMA in particular needs to cut out the woowoo and wake up to this fact! Or else it will drown in its own arrogance and become a museum piece.
I know there are plenty now, in the wake of the MMA explosion and the wake up call issued, who love CMA to the extent of wanting to make it work for them, and they can see that the best way to test and learn is through combat sports. Many also disagree and that's fine, no one is forcing them to partake. But for those heroes willing to face honest competition and therefore abandon the fallacy of a zero loss rate in order to truly progress, for the future of IMA wouldn't it be good to share info about what comps are available and to make their rules transparent?
I say no its not "better I contact the organisers to obtain their specific rules", better the organisers post transparent rules and relevant information and IMA / CMA start working together if they don't want to eventually lose what ever is left of the dedicated, every honest hard-working student, to MMA etc.
Working together, sharing information, that's communication, the basis of community! We have enough hermits in our CMA history! ;-)
Last edited by
Niall Keane on Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Emperor has no clothes on!