middleway wrote:thanks for the article. It is very traditional arts focused and misses some points that i deem vital. It order of preference :
1) Good students (the MOST Important thing)
2) Honesty (No bullshit, no big claims)
3) Trustworthy ( The student should feel safe when training with the coach.)
3) No Pedestals (Never placing themselves higher than their students... we are all just humans ... no amount of martial arts will change that.)
4) Putting their students before their 'art'. ( by this i mean no training system, no tradition, no lineage, should be place higher in importance than a person, be them a newby or a long term practitioner.)
thanks again for your thoughts.
Chris
Orpheus wrote:Out of curiosity, are you responsible for the formatting? Why are there words and clauses that have a larger font and are in bold? I assume it is for emphasis, but it is confusing and makes it harder to read, especially when the emphasis doesn't make sense.
Bao wrote:Orpheus wrote:Out of curiosity, are you responsible for the formatting? Why are there words and clauses that have a larger font and are in bold? I assume it is for emphasis, but it is confusing and makes it harder to read, especially when the emphasis doesn't make sense.
JB is not even the owner of the blog, it's up to the admin to format the texts.
Free blog = ready to use designs that someone else made. It has a few years on the neck. Slightly out dated.
charles wrote:.... your article is way off the mark on many levels, not the least of which is to quote Gandhi - a renowned pacifist - without crediting him, in the context of teaching martial arts. Surely, you can see the irony - or inappropriateness - of that....
Orpheus wrote:I didn't see other articles with similar formatting on the blog. I thought maybe the writer submitted formatting tags with the article. If it is outside JB's control, then can't really hold that on him.
Pandrews1982 wrote:Gandhi - Be the change you wish to see in the world
Bhassler wrote:"I have been repeating over and over again that he who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honor by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. ...
charles wrote:In my opinion, your article does a disservice to novice students in their search for a good teacher, the opposite to what you believe you are accomplishing.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests