dspyrido wrote:LaoDan wrote:Perhaps XYZ has already been defined, at least in the Yang Shao-Hou curriculum/lineage:
In an interview from China Wushu Magazine (http://goldeneaglemac.com/?p=62) from the mid seventies with Chang Yiu-Chun a student of Yang Shao-Hou (from 1911 until Yang’s death in 1930;
Really enjoyed this interview. Some great commentary with a lot of intrigue & controversy. Not sure if it's all accurate or not but still thought provoking.
A. Firstly he would not recognize the name because it was not called Taijiquan until fairly recently. He would even recognize what is being taught in his name today. Unless he saw the Yang Shao-Hou style
interesting interview
No, only my behind was sore when I hit the floor , I did not feel anything at first but later there was some slight swelling around where he struck me.
Q. And did you eventually learn these techniques.
A. Only when I had been with Yang for many years and even though I was a family member, I had to prove myself to be an honorable person.
Q. What do you mean by an honorable person.
A. By that I mean that I would never go out and use these techniques for the purpose of being boastful or to show off. Yang taught that if we were ever provoked that we should try to play the coward first of all but if that failed then we must act so quickly as to not allow our attackers to know which techniques we were using.
seems kinda the opposite of what many here ask about and practice for.
What happened after Yang Shao-Hou died, the style seemed to disappear.
A. Yes, the few senior students of Yang Shao-Hou decided that it would be best not to teach what we knew to everyone and so we all went our different ways to teach only a selected few students.
Q. How many students did you have?
A. I only taught about seven people what I knew and they in turn did not teach many.
very different way of thinking. no internet back then no utube.