Dmitri wrote:Then IME it should be inseparable from the physical
no, because someone my have the proper intent to do something but not the proper structure to do it.
thanks
Dmitri wrote:Then IME it should be inseparable from the physical
Dmitri wrote:But then it's not "intent" in the IMA sense of the word.
(At least in my personal vocabulary.)
Dmitri wrote:Waaaay off-topic, there... Briefly -- the taiji and jj coexisted very well for the 6 or so years I've done both, I forming one another in different ways. On sabbatical from taiji for almost 2 years now, for various complex reasons. Still think Yang taiji (or any other style), done correctly, is a great stand-up MA.
Mostly grappling, with MMA stuff only once every month or two, these days. But I've always paid attention to possibility of strikes/kicks when rolling, and almost never use gi-dependent moves.
willie wrote:Dmitri wrote:Waaaay off-topic, there... Briefly -- the taiji and jj coexisted very well for the 6 or so years I've done both, I forming one another in different ways. On sabbatical from taiji for almost 2 years now, for various complex reasons. Still think Yang taiji (or any other style), done correctly, is a great stand-up MA.
Mostly grappling, with MMA stuff only once every month or two, these days. But I've always paid attention to possibility of strikes/kicks when rolling, and almost never use gi-dependent moves.
topics dead anyways.
good response. I've found about the same thing.
for me it's never been one against the other, they can co-exist. on the down
side is MMA schools that I've been to kind-of have a forget all you know attitude.
yet they don't even know anything about internal arts.
so the arts go together just fine but the ego's don't.
thanks for your honest reply.
dspyrido wrote:willie wrote:Dmitri wrote:Waaaay off-topic, there... Briefly -- the taiji and jj coexisted very well for the 6 or so years I've done both, I forming one another in different ways. On sabbatical from taiji for almost 2 years now, for various complex reasons. Still think Yang taiji (or any other style), done correctly, is a great stand-up MA.
Mostly grappling, with MMA stuff only once every month or two, these days. But I've always paid attention to possibility of strikes/kicks when rolling, and almost never use gi-dependent moves.
topics dead anyways.
good response. I've found about the same thing.
for me it's never been one against the other, they can co-exist. on the down
side is MMA schools that I've been to kind-of have a forget all you know attitude.
yet they don't even know anything about internal arts.
so the arts go together just fine but the ego's don't.
thanks for your honest reply.
Re MMA schools - they are usually there to teach you what they know & the assumption is that they have to take the raw material of people who know nothing & build them up. Not have to accommodate for every possible martial arts variation & build a system that fits for them. If you want personalised service you would probably need to do privates.
Also be aware they are not there to listen to what you know & if you look at the common dude who walks in off the street they seem to know it all. Imagine being a coach with decades of experience who has competed at the international level having to listen to every know it all about how it should be done.
I train with a lot of different people. Many have no idea what I have done in the past & usually won't have an inkling because when in learning mode I like to listen to what is being taught, ask questions & try to work out how it can work for me. The only time this perception changes is if I am teaching, sparring or hitting pads.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests