by yeniseri on Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:49 pm
From a CCM absolutist point of view, mingmen is dantian in that reference as dantain, since one time dantian had about 5 locations over centuries. Mingmen is just the posterior dantian (lower, in this case).
In a relativist point of view per modern viewpoint, they speak to the central 'ground point of daimai and fits its framework well. I am sure there exists texts on their validity but it is complementary while noting is goes against the current TCM model, where mingmen, dantian (obviously we need to verify as it does not refrerence upper, middle or lower, where the latter is qihai while sharing distinction of front and back location references.
Personally mingmen isn't, doesn't appear to have the necessary foundation to improve daimai but structurally and mechanistically with anatomy and physiology, any weakness of lumbar-sacral area (mingmen/shenshu affects the body's foundation and when the lower (actually middle roots) suffers, cracks within a foundation (musculoskeletal) will showitself
My CCM/TCM reference for women with menstrual lower back stiffness is application of hands at mengmen/shenshu vis a vis qihai and the former will show better relief of back related stiffness. QIhai will be useless and as it may aggravate the problem! I realize this is a round about explanation but it is the best way to explain while retaining the contextual points of CCM and anatomy and physiology in my limited fashion.
When fascism comes to US America, It will be wrapped in the US flag and waving a cross. An astute patriot