I think a very important commonality between striking and grappling is the use of the shoulders, or upper back, to aim at the opponent. Once the shoulders are remotely locked on to the opponent,
meaning directional and not necessarily through contact, ones structure is aligned in such a way as to redirect your opponents force, or the rebound force when striking your opponent, back to the ground.
It seems to be a sort of universal postural rule that the shoulders be re-oriented in such a way as to best deal with opposing force. When walking about or standing, the prime resistance is related generally to gravity,
so people walk with their shoulders directed upwards. When lifting something we keep our shoulders facing upwards. But when facing an opponent who is in front of you, the shoulders should adjust in
order to be directed towards the opponent. This can be more subtle, such as in boxing, or quite obvious, such as in Olympic wrestling, but in both cases the shoulders are aimed or locked on to the opponent so that the full force of ones actions is directed towards the opponent.
What are your thoughts on this? It seems to me that Chinese martial arts contains some reflection of this principle, particularly in xinyi liuhe and some other practices, but often the shoulders remained directed upwards, as if
one only had to contend with gravity, is this do to some lost of practical sensibility?