willie wrote:Yang simplified the art to make it easier to learn, But in doing so, left out an entire array of undisclosed universal concepts.
I believe that in order to fill this void, alternative theories replaced the unspoken universal laws.
Serena wrote: the origin is from military fighting techniques and not daoist sages. you should stop and think about what must have really happened .
willie wrote:While there are Yang style masters who are quite good, Chen has much more martial in it.
Yang simplified the art to make it easier to learn, But in doing so, left out an entire array of undisclosed universal concepts.
Serena wrote:
So either they are related because they, in truth, came from the same thing, or are different because in truth, their origins and core skills are different -- or they are related/different because human bodies are human bodies and there are a limited number of ways qi can flow in any given meridian.
.
Taste of Death wrote:willie wrote:Yang simplified the art to make it easier to learn, But in doing so, left out an entire array of undisclosed universal concepts.
I believe that in order to fill this void, alternative theories replaced the unspoken universal laws.
The Yangs likely taught an empty version of their art to the guards, who were of a different ethnicity. They kept the concepts in the family art.
Wu Quanyou was a military officer cadet of Manchu ancestry in the Yellow Banner camp (see Qing Dynasty Military) in the Forbidden City, Beijing and also a hereditary officer of the Imperial Guards Brigade.[3] At that time, Yang Lu-ch'an was the martial arts instructor in the Imperial Guards, teaching t'ai chi ch'uan, and in 1850 Wu Ch'uan-yu became one of his students.[2]
In 1870, Wu Ch'uan-yu was asked to become the senior disciple of Yang Pan-hou, Yang Lu-ch'an's oldest adult son, and an instructor as well to the Manchu military.[1][2] Wu Ch'uan-yu had three primary disciples: his son Wu Chien-ch'uan, Wang Mao Zhai and Guo Fen.[4]
Wu Ch'uan-yu's son, Wu Chien-ch'uan, and grandchildren: grandsons Wu Kung-i and Wu Kung-tsao as well as granddaughter Wu Ying-hua were well known teachers.[3]
Bao wrote:willie wrote:While there are Yang style masters who are quite good, Chen has much more martial in it.
That's just ridiculous. There are plenty of Yang Schools that focus on Tai Chi solely as a martial art.Yang simplified the art to make it easier to learn, But in doing so, left out an entire array of undisclosed universal concepts.
That's not true. He created a version for teaching officials and literati. The other things he didn't throw away, but left for family and indoor disciples. Just because 98% of all Yang style schools around is watered down and somewhat stupid doesn't mean that there is no good Yang style around.
Funny that Chen style people think that Yang style is a watered down non-martial tai chi. Just go to the Chen village. All they ever teach is form and no fighting whatsoever except sports wrestling (what they call push hands).
willie wrote:
The Yangs likely taught an empty version of their art to the guards, who were of a different ethnicity. They kept the concepts in the family art
dude, Again, and for the others. Yang was Chen, so if your not seeing parts of Chen in Yang then it was intentionally removed.
so I want you to repeat after me 1000 times.
Yang was Chen
Yang was nothing without Chen
Chen family made Yang great.
willie wrote:
I don't have any dog in this fight either. I really don't care what no one thinks. I'm the one who has to fight when it's my time.
also, I promised myself years ago that I would leave the arts behind for good and like a stubborn ass I'm still doing it.
The best yang style that I have ever personally felt was like you just described, like fighting a water bed, a river, a tornado.
The manifestation of the mind focused into reality.
Thanks for your post.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests