middleway wrote:When I first experienced Tai Chi 'application' it was a chap that would later become my student and it was very standard stuff I liked it all but was heavily into Daito Ryu at the time and it was nothing ground breaking.
Later Alex showed me his Tai Chi application ... it was after an extended period training with Chen Yuen San I believe. It was something i had never encountered before and the power was immediately shocking and horrible to encounter and experience.
Now and at the time, I likened it to how imagine fighting a thunder cloud, nothing tangible until you get struck by lightening Chen Yuen San had the same sort of thing about him when I had a short exchange with him.
Whenever i think about Tai Chi for fighting this is how i remember it feeling and what i try to emulate.
hodmeist wrote:I really enjoyed the blog. Nothing compares to personal experience and I found yours interesting. Thanks for posting.
willie wrote:An accompaniment.
GrahamB wrote:Yes!
Timing and distance management are not the two most important things for fighting 'with Tai Chi' - they're the two most important things for fighting, full stop.
middleway wrote:. It was something i had never encountered before and the power was immediately shocking and horrible to encounter and experience.
...
Whenever i think about Tai Chi for fighting this is how i remember it feeling and what i try to emulate.
cloudz wrote:Bao, I love it when people share their experiences like you have in your blog, nice and honest. No agenda to speak of.
Just sharing your doing of something you love and have a passion for a CIMA (the whole point of this board?), a bit of "fighting" can be good for the soul.. for some more than others.
...
Thank you for sharing.
I live to be attacked and receive attacks and harm coming my way.. I try to live it and breathe it as much as I can.
A bit like a persecution complex!
TAIJI’S BOOSTING OR DISSIPATING ENERGY & STRENGTH
補瀉氣力於自己難補瀉氣力於人亦難補自己者知覺功虧則補運動功過則瀉所以求諸己不易也補於人者氣過則補之力過則瀉之此勝彼敗所由然也氣過或瀉力過或補其理雖一然其有詳夫過補為之過上加過遇瀉為之緩他不及他必更過仍加過也補氣瀉力於人之法均為加過於人矣補氣名曰結氣法瀉力名曰空力法
There is difficulty in boosting or dissipating your own energy and strength. There is also difficulty in boosting or dissipating the energy and strength of the opponent. When your awareness is insufficient, boost [your energy]. When your movement is overdone, dissipate [your strength]. These are things that are not easy matters when it comes to yourself.
When the opponent has too much energy, boost it. When he has too much strength, dissipate it. By this means, you will win and he will lose. Or you may when he has too much energy, dissipate it, or when he has too much strength, boost it. The principle is the same in either case, and yet to elaborate further: if he has too much [of either], add more so that he is overdoing, or if he has too little [of either], dissipate it further so that in his insufficiency he adds more and again ends up overdoing. Both boosting his energy and dissipating his strength induce him to overdo it. Boosting his energy is called the method of “tying up his energy”. Dissipating his strength is c
windwalker wrote:I live to be attacked and receive attacks and harm coming my way.. I try to live it and breathe it as much as I can.
A bit like a persecution complex!
Taiji has IMO a unique way of dealing with things.
different mind set...
marvin8 wrote:I thought that was a great article. I found it honest, practical and insightful.
I also appreciated middleway’s comment on experiencing high level skills. The defense is there (not there, like a cloud), but the extreme power is there, at the same time.
willie wrote:hi windy. a different mind set and a different body set.
on the other quote getting attacked is no fun. do you know that some coward neg. my video right away. lol!
they don't know shit...my stuff comes right from the top...personally I would rather be attacked in the street by someone I can get my f...ing hands on.
then get attacked on the net by cowards with hidden agenda's who don't know shit and who are embarrassed by those who do.
yeniseri wrote:I would quicker ask if someone can kick, block, throw, etc within a fighting context as opposed to fighting with taijiquan. Just me, I will add
Bao wrote:Middleway had a good input. Though I find focusing on power detrimental to the tai chi mind set. The only two times that I have really hurt someone, I never thought about it or planned to. And for me it felt like nothing. If you feel, or try to feel strength or power, it means that the strength/power get stuck in your own body. Power is an expression felt on your opponent. The focus should still be on calmness and balance. I like the word "emptiness", but I know this word means little for many. Trying to feel powerful is, imho, going the wrong way. If you need it, it will be there.
Bao wrote:marvin8 wrote:I also appreciated middleway’s comment on experiencing high level skills. The defense is there (not there, like a cloud), but the extreme power is there, at the same time.
Middleway had a good input. Though I find focusing on power detrimental to the tai chi mind set. The only two times that I have really hurt someone, I never thought about it or planned to. And for me it felt like nothing. If you feel, or try to feel strength or power, it means that the strength/power get stuck in your own body. Power is an expression felt on your opponent. The focus should still be on calmness and balance. I like the word "emptiness", but I know this word means little for many. Trying to feel powerful is, imho, going the wrong way. If you need it, it will be there. The hardest part I think, is to put confidence in what really represents tai chi and most IMA. People usually try to take short cuts and keep adding things from other styles to compensate their lack of confidence and "faith". But, imho, these are the most important things to make it work.
In Li Yiyu’s “Five Key Words,” he stated: “Empty does not mean completely devoid of strength (li), and full does not mean to completely stand firm (zhan sha).” This understanding is echoed in Yang Chengfu’s discussion of empty and full in the legs in his “Discussion of Taijiquan Practice,” where he said, “What is here called empty is not void, for its power is not yet disconnected, but reserved and retained in the intention of the changes of expansion and contraction. What is called full is simply that it is sound and real—without excessive use of energy, which would mean use of fierce strength.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests