GrahamB wrote:You haven't described anything that makes anything "tai chi".
Then if you really want to discuss what you believe makes Tai Chi eh... Tai Chi, then why don't you start by explaining what you believe makes it Tai Chi?
I doubt you will...
What sort of body movement is required, for example? That's probably where I'd start.
In my post there's description of what kind of body movement that should be there. Then what is missing to make it Tai Chi?
Then after that basic Jin.
What is basic Jin according to you?
But those two things alone would be a massive undertaking to describe in full.
I probably wouldn't attempt it...
.. if you don't care to explain what you mean ...
Edit: Never mind. If I come off as defensive, it's merely an expression of frustration of my own lack of ability to verbalize my thoughts properly. Apparently I can't make my points clear or express myself very good. I am not going to discuss these things further. Not now, maybe later. But thank you for painting out weaknesses in what I wrote and challenging the line of my thoughts. I sincerely appreciate that you take time and effort to comment my OP.