Niall Keane wrote:Clearly its an early MMA, and it stands to reason that as its four pillars are die pu, shaai jiao, chin na and dim mak, that it will have plenty of shared techniques and principles with shuai jiao the style itself.
I wouldn't call it an MMA, I'd call it a CMA, the C meaning "Complete".
What we learn in my line is that taijiquan contains:
Tui-Kick
Da-Strike
Shuai-Throw
Na-Lock
Die Pu and Dim Mak were never really discussed specifically, I see them more as subsets of Da, I suppose.
And, of course, I almost forgot that my training includes weapons work. I love weapons.
Niall Keane wrote:you're starting to make sense man!
Look out! Next thing you know the cubs will be winning the world series!
as for "an" , yea I see Douglas Wile translated "an" in writings attributed to T'an Meng-hsein in the song of 8 ways as "push". i'm not mad about Yang Cheng-fu's approach though. Other Yang stylists, from Banhou line I know seem in accord with the Wu style and my own in "an" being a downward crushing force, the crush generated through an element of peng rotating with the downward press in the application.
This is what I've been trying to say. Downward is one option. Upwards is for uprooting and not hurting people. Downward is to really ruin someone's day. If you're generating enough force to launch 180 lbs ten feet back in the air, it doesn't take much imagination to figure out what that would to if directed into a compromised structure. The pistol fingers to the temple example I gave earlier is the downwards crushing.
I practice the "push" posture in my form, for example, with a downward an on the shift back and an upward an on the shift forward. The sinking in "needle at sea bottom" is another place it's very evident. I train it outside of the form with resistance bands anchored overhead, or anytime in daily life that I have to apply force downwards. Flushing a toilet, for example.
And yes, "Yang Family Secret Transmissions" is my primary source for the vocabulary about the intricacies. I consider and categorize information from other sources according to that base.
these terms can be useful when coaching for sure, but I guarantee you if you asked the lemmings in the push chi demo above you'd have as many different esoteric explanations.
Most students don't do their homework.
I think there is some resistance to Qi as a concept based on poor communication concerning what it is.
On the one hand, there's the bioelectric energy, on the other, there is the "intention wave". One is not the other and lots of foolishness and misunderstanding occurs when people start to conflate the two.
Think about the saying "It's all in the wrist" and tell me what "it" is.
"It" is Qi. If you've ever played the drums, you know that the way you think about holding the stick can change everything about how the stick behaves and the way it sounds. In a martial arts context, with that understanding of Qi, there is a world of difference between throwing a hand through space with the Qi in the arm and fingers vs moving a body full of Qi that expresses Jin at the point of contact. There's a difference between swinging a sword and moving a sword with your Qi projected into it.
Windy came up with a few such half-whispered magic spells just there, cunningly (he thinks) disguised as questions about moving just one lemming in the line. (its not like these charlatans ever saw the "pick a brick in the stack for me to break" trick and thought of incorporating the act into their own jive, no its because MAGIC)
Windwalker and I talk out of band frequently, and I have a lot of respect for what he brings to the discussion. I don't fully understand everything he tries to tell me and I haven't experienced much of what he says he has experienced, but I don't discount what he's saying or deny that he has experienced those things. He believes firmly in Newton's laws and doesn't believe in magic Qi powers. That can sometimes get lost in translation.
I have never met anyone who claimed to do some of the things he's seen, so I have not had an opportunity to test it for myself, so I therefore reserve judgment concerning it until I can experience it for myself. I am skeptical but open to experience.
Regarding "picking a lemming" sure, being able to "thread the pearl" and affect a particular person in that line of pushers would be an interesting demonstration. Simply rooting and knocking them back, not so much. But that particular trick is, as we both know, a common facet of taijiquan demonstrations that is effective in generating interest among those not in the know.
That kind of scattered, unnecessary complexity just wrecks my head, but sure I've been accused of being "simple" in approach by a poster before. I think he meant it as an insult? Don't know why, simplicity of expression is what I would consider "elegance", and its what I strive to achieve, some day maybe?
Simplicity is good! The simpler a movement is, the more varied and powerful the uses for it. The simpler an approach is, the more effectively you can train. I spend the largest amount of my training time in silk reeling -two circles that are at the heart of every other movement in my system.
Speaking for myself, the only thing I can accuse you of is being a bit closed minded and tunnel-visioned. You've acquired a decent sized set of the tools of taijiquan that meets the needs of your particular focus, and you are working to hone and refine those tools. I just believe that there is even more to the art than what you're training and due to my particular focus, I spend more time working on those other areas.
Honoring and respecting each other's approach and practice in no way diminishes our own practice.
I'll confess that there is a little bit of sour grapes behind my opposition to competition. My knee is permanently compromised due to unsportsmanlike conduct from a frustrated and ego-driven BJJ blue belt who couldn't take me down when I had less than two months training in that art and working within the confines of a pure grappling framework. I'll never be competitive again due to that injury, but as I said, it doesn't matter. It isn't a necessary part of developing or proving my gongfu.
But I put 2-4 hours a day, every day, for seven years into becoming a more efficient fighter before I stopped training, so to have someone come along and dismiss the integrity of the authentic transmission I received and my damn hard and sincere effort and study as some kind of substandard "boxercise" is highly offensive. Particularly when I'm coming back after the break and rediscovering the marvels within.