vadaga wrote:Good question Wayne. I would say there is a set of things to talk about
1. teacher able to teach
2. teacher able to fight
3. student able to fight
for me, as long as 1 and particularly 3 are satisfied, 2 is not so important
This sets apart the whole 'mental cultivation' and health aspects of training but we could think similarly about them.
agree,
Look at "martial art" coaches / teachers as the same as those in boxing...
although culturally, and historically martial art teachers in China were not regarded as the same...
In China there is a category called folk teachers typically referred to as "masters, who have a deep knowledge of the history, philosophy, and techniques of their specific martial art, often becoming respected members of their local community.
They may or may not produce known students of their respective methods but are known
locally as the best people to gain either skill sets or knowledge of specific methods
in Boxing
Cus D'Amato, Eddie Futch, Emanuel Steward
all produced famous fighters, in each case none where professional fighters themselves.
They demonstrated the essence of the craft, through those they helped to develop
into fighters later on becoming quite famous...