SitYodTong wrote:None of those individual arts are "new", with the possible exception of BJJ, and that depends on how you define the term--BJJ is older than art that many folks consider "traditional".
There is no question in my mind that IMA/CMA are useful and practical, if trained correctly. The problem is that too many IMA folks seem to want to feel better about the fact that they don't spar or train hard enough to use their arts, and too many MMA folks think they have the ultimate answer to all martial arts created since the beginnign of time. Rather than learn from each other most practicioners are content to stay in their own world where their fanatasies of invincibiltiy can remian untouched by reality.
soundofwater wrote:Overall, I think it is good to build a solid foundation in the higher elements of a "style" or emphasis (train in depth), then broaden one's skill set based on what seems most practical, interesting, and available at that point in time. Once one develops the ability to train and learn in a healthy and mindful way, and additional skills in various "styles" or approaches will come more quickly, assuming a solid foundation of movement, power, quickness, and strength.
An additional suggestion: Do the tough stuff early. By this I mean the training that requires better conditioning, strength, and flexibility and then leave the less physically intense training for when your body begins to age. Just as an example, wrestling or throwing early then striking and/or groundwork then weapons.
Pat wrote:on the other hand, if i can't make my technique, i think "i suck! the new guy beat me! i need to work!" very humbling.
thank you New Guy! you took me off my pedestal!
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: Bao and 19 guests