johnwang wrote:Do you agree with these statements?
- 输跤不输把, It's OK to lose in throwing but it's not OK to lose in grip fight.
- 跤好撂,手难学, It's easy to learn throws but it's hard to learn grip fight.
ppscat wrote:My skills are not good enough to answer those questions.
Instead I ask you why chin-na is not used in SC, as far as I could "research" on videoclips? Is it dismissed because (I guess) is difficult to apply in a more realistic combat? Or just a sport rule to prevent injuries?
Thanks!
ppscat wrote:Instead I ask you why chin-na is not used in SC, as far as I could "research" on videoclips? Is it dismissed because (I guess) is difficult to apply in a more realistic combat? Or just a sport rule to prevent injuries?
C.J.Wang wrote:I wonder if "把(ba)" could be translated simply as "grip fight." In Northern CMA terminology, "ba" has multiple meanings depending on the context in which it's used. In the case of SC, I think it also carries the idea of "obtaining superior hand/body position."
- 输跤不输把, It's OK to lose in throwing but it's not OK to lose in grip fight
- 跤好撂,手难学, It's easy to learn throws but it's hard to learn grip fight
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: johnwang and 147 guests