No. The clips you posted weren't fights. The first was a "sucker punch." Technically, so was the second.
A fight involves an actual clash. Nobody "relaxes and maintains their breathing" when the other guy ACTUALLY ATTACKS. And you'll be reaching anaerobic capacity pretty much within the first 20 seconds of the fight, if not sooner. To use your clips as an example, if the other guy had actually blocked and countered (or blocked and forced the initiator to throw another punch, then it's a fight. And it would be anaerobic by the third "move.")
Keep in mind, by definition, it's only aerobic if you're only working at 60-70 percent max. A fight requires you to go all out, all the time, and that's anaerobic. That's why "strength endurance" is so much more important for a fighter (or combat athlete) than cardio endurance of the type a triathlete/cyclist/marathoner develops.
- Kent
Ian wrote:ashe wrote:Ian wrote:how can anyone make blanket statements like "fighting's aerobic / anaerobic"? some are and some aren't.
if you're not in the anaerobic range, you're not fighting, you're playing.
Ashe, I agree with you like 80% of the time, but that is just utter bullshit.
Unless your definition of "fighting" is something along the lines of sparring for 10 rounds in a ring, then you are so off the mark it's incredible, coming from you.
What about people who can end a fight quickly? Or guys who are just good at staying relaxed and maintaining their breathing so that they don't get tired?
So according to you these aren't fights?