by Andy_S on Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:31 pm
Good to see Cartmell producing more material on CMA. As Tom notes, the man has some of the widest combative experience out there, having moved beyond per se CMA.
Jake:
You are doing Sun AND Zhaobao under Tim? I have always been interested in Tim's Zhaobao work, which I believe focuses heavily on foundational gongfu training...? Any info on your training in this art would most appreciated. Also, I know very little about Sun Taiji (Tom kindly sent me a DVD a few years back) but am intrigued by its rep for being applicable with little or no change from the form, indicating it is a technique-based system, rather than a gongfu training regimen in of iteself. Comments?
D-Glenn:
What you posted re Sun and BJ seems a reasonable statement. While the CMA teachers of yore would have had the upper hand had it come to a duel with sword or spear, I don't think they had:
Anything like the empty-hand fighting exposure that modern MMA peeps (AFAIK, there was no leitei circuit in pre-modern China, just occassional ad hoc events and individual challenges);
The range of technique - kick, punch, throw, lock, G&P, ground submissions, etc - that modern MMA people do; or
The outstanding conditioning that modern athletes are forced to adopt.
Times change, and so do MA. I think MMA today is probably the most wide-ranging and realistic application of martial arts in recent history...superior to both Olde English prize fighting and Chinese leitei challenges. This is not to say that the old boys were not great men and pioneers in martial methodologies - but they must be judged by the standards and experience of their own age. To judge them by the standards of today is an unfair comparison to them.
Services available:
Pies scoffed. Ales quaffed. Beds shat. Oiks irked. Chavs chinned. Thugs thumped. Sacks split. Arses goosed. Udders ogled. Canines consumed. Sheep shagged.Matrons outraged. Vicars enlightened. PM for rates.