Sylkworm wrote:Obviously, I am lacking in teaching experience compared to other posters here. However, my Sifu always used to say "never offer more to your students than they are willing to give".
I forgot who mentioned the hippie Taiji-health lady, but I think that would present an interesting teaching challenge. I have to wonder: *is* there a way to teach correct Taiji without resorting to combat scenarios? It would seem like it should be possible. I'll have to think about it.
The reason I think so is because I occasionally run into students on the flip-side of this coin in Kung Fu and Jujitsu: i.e. the ones that are usually young men that only want to learn combat application. If it doesn't have immediate applicability in a ring or octagon, they think it's just fluff and lose all interest. These students are also frustrating because they are often very good fighters, experienced in other MA styles, and it's hard to actually prove anything with them without actually kicking their ass at least once. Very often, if you mention "Qi" or "Dantien" to them, they just run for the hills because they think you're trying get all mystical. So I have to talk about breathing, rooting, centering, posture, connection, sensitivity, and Jing in terms of bio-mechanics and physics.
You have to get them to experience the difference. Spar them at the beginning of class, then go through all the normal taiji stuff, then spar them again. Do this after about 2 to 4 weeks of consistent practice in class and they should notice the difference themselves.