I will quote one of my favourite authors:
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? " Douglas Adams.
I think if we demystify all the seemingly marveouls things, see how they work, we will take more resbonsibility for others and for the other fellow species that inhabit the planet too and the universe itself. We must know why it is wrong to burn someone who is accused as a witch. We must know why abortion can be right. we must know, why too much co2 is bad for the planet, we must know why there is incest, why we murder, why we are aggresive.
And only if there is high probaplity that statements are true, then we discuss, what culture, what world view, what what moral standards seem the most resonable.
People are afraid of what there really is, because they deloud themselves in a false sense of security.
Moral standards, dogmas, theories, must always be questioned in the light of new evidence.(
Science must also be questioned, therefore we have a discipline in (analytic) philosphy that does that too (philosophy of science)).
A may be a christian and he is too afraid to let his dogma go, because all his former life may be lie, all his actions were based on a lie.
B may belive he is talking with god, but suddenly neuro science shows him, it was all in head.
C thought that his traditional martial arts training(forms, forms and forms, eventually a little pushing hands and very little applications), that he did not question a bit, makes him a good fighter. But he will never try, because it could turn out, he has wasted all his time.
D wants to be gay, but in his head, there is "Gays go to hell". He will never question the norm "Dont be gay or you will go to hell" because he is too afraid of what will happen if he suddenly is openly gay.
There seems to be an agreement, that it is alright for people to lie to themselves in bad situations. "A had terrible expierneces in life, his parents have died, he is broke and so on". So suddenly its alright for him, to believe in total rubbish, just to get him trough the day.
I think this totaly wrong. We, as the human race should build a world, that is based on rational discourse, honesty, understanding and strength(mental strength, to have the gut, to see things as they are, take resbonsibility etc.). I know this is hard, even if we dont succed, we should at least try.
I think that statement is midly offensive implying that people who do not believe in a God are somehow more intelligent or are superior to those with greater opportunities for education.
Education is not a sufficent condition(meaning good schools etc.). But learning and understanding is. look at africa(esp. primitives), islamic countries(fanatics) or europe in the middle ages. Why did they and do believe in total rubbish?
Also I think, it would be only offensive if I want to make them fell bad and I want the feeling of superiority.
Why call the universe "divine" if we even do not know how to define a word like that? I´m a strong believer, that we should not use words and sentences(without further explainations), where noone has an idea how to define them
correctly (what they may mean) or that do not make sense in discourse with information value(in literature you can).
Examples: "Punch without your shoulder."
"Make your body as a dead rotten tree".
"True strength is total weakness."
"Punch from the dan tien."
"This exercise is good for the chi."
"Pure Being and pure nothing are, therefore, the same."
"Open the 7 chakras and kundalini will flow."
I hope someone will understand it and sorry for typos and so on.