fuga wrote:TaoJoannes wrote:With the FMA in particular, I see something that no other weapons system seems to include, the apparently gratuitous movements of the stick. This would seem to waste energy and put the player in various positions that would appear to limit or change the potentially effective movements. In my own experience, holding a relatively stationary guard from which to work would better conserve energy and make accurate point (as in a point in space, not a point on a scoresheet) striking easier. If I understand correctly, these are to act as "feints" of a sort, and a whole set of techniques are designed to work from these positions, but in mismatched situations such as this, with absolutely no offense intended, it seems like the lower level player gets into a state of just moving it to keep it moving, and that opens the door for the senior, and calmer, player to strike at will. edit Example around 0:10 to 0:21 in the second clip. /edit
Would anyone care to speak to this?
I was taught to move the weapon hand so it does not get struck. It is the closest target. If you leave your weapon hand out there stationary, it is pretty much guaranteed to get hit. It is easier to hit a stationary target than a randomly moving one. And in a blade context, that can mean losing your weapon (and fingers).
That sounds reasonable, yet thin. The hand isn't tied there unless your attention lapses, an attack to the fingers can be just as easily evaded or deflected as an attack to any other part of the body, and despite all efforts for human beings to create "random" movements, patterns inevitably emerge, and can make it even easier for an astute observer to predict where the hand will be and strike it.
Bear in mind, I'm not really taking issue with it, just looking to get a better understanding. That could be one, very reasonable, purpose for the practice.
I have to wonder about the weight of the weapons as a factor. Moving a half-pound knife around as oppossed to a pound-and-a-half knife around would make a huge difference in energy expenditure. Perhaps the lighter weapons of the filipinos and indonesians are a reason for the method?