allen2saint wrote:particularly with Aikido, because it clearly was Ueshiba's intention to make practice accessible to all people. He said as much. If that was not so, my friend would still be using or dead.But accessible does not mean we can define it how we please.
emptycloud wrote:Zonker wrote:empty cloud wrote: Q. Your walking down the street and someone attacks you. Who is the most important person ? You or them ? .
That question just made my tea come out my nose!
Clean Nose Zonker the Honker - any answers though..?
allen2saint wrote:And about street violence...having worked a year in my city's toughest prison, underestimating anyone whose livelihood comes from the practice of violence is absolutely foolish. They keep going because they succeeded a bunch of times. If they were idiots, they never would have made it off their block.
Zonker wrote:All these posts over the last two days have been really informative and interesting to read. Trying to get back to the the initial thread, is it possible at this point to get back to what O-sensei was doing pre-war? I really liked Ellis Amdur's conclusions in "Hidden in Plain Sight" wherein he stated that we can train in IP/IMA with individuals such as Mr. Harden, Mr. Akuzawa or Mr. Sigman and transfer what we learn there to our aikido practice, but what we eventually end up with won't be O-sensei's aikido, it'll be our own. Any thoughts?
I feel that aikido or any art means different things to different people at different times of their lives. I feel that if you want to stick at the art for a lifetime then you have to make it your own in response to changes to ones shifting perceptions of self and world. After sometime I feel the form of the art is irrelevant, especially in aikido where one is I feel simply enhancing and making sublime, natural movement already embodied before any aikido was even considered as a study. This I feel is where the art differs from other arts. In tai chi you are perhaps making learnt movements natural, in aikido you are making natural movements only... So in a sense you own the art the very moment you decide the art is the one for you..
allen2saint wrote:What I love about going to a serious academic institution for grad school is you learn how to think critically and operate in a venue where proof matters. No one can walk into a room and declare something without being challenged for data and proofs. Good professors go to great, great lengths to prove their assertions, based on past works and by making clear, critically verifiable connections to other well established facts, which are systematically cited.
I wish the martial arts had this same standard.
allen2saint wrote:Lol...says the guy who just abstracted Aikido to the most espoteric and erudite deconstructions I have ever heard? Says the guy who a few posts ago was going on and on about his own little self indulgent diatribe on how it all was Aikido somehow? So, what you're really trying to say is, it's all Aikido as long as it fits into your experience and your opinions, right? If its someone else's then it's simply not "real" to you.
My professors have done more real work and know their work better than you will ever dream of. What do you think academic work is? Living and breathing with your subject day by day. Please go back to your cup and your relational dynamics.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests