GrahamB wrote:Like Graham?????????
Damn right. Goddamn hippy.
GrahamB wrote:Like Graham?????????
willywrong wrote:I think that people should have to walk the walk as well is talk the talk.
Niall Keane wrote:so the op video is basically dont step, reach with the hand first, its faster.......
Bhassler wrote:willywrong wrote:I think that people should have to walk the walk as well is talk the talk.
In the real world, I agree. But since all we have to work with here is reason and the interwebs, I think we should adapt to the tools at hand and hold true to the methods for testing that are available to us.
It is funny, though, how the conversation changes in face to face meetings when people know that the immediate response to any sort of assertion will be "show me", followed by a grab, punch, throw, the taking up of weapons, etc.
Good times, all around.
Teazer wrote:Niall Keane wrote:so the op video is basically dont step, reach with the hand first, its faster.......
Mostly because it is safer rather than necessarily faster, though having tried it a number of ways, h/b/f is indeed very quick. With such a weapon there is a lot less requirement of generating impact, so while it is a weaker strike than stepping in, winding up, and then swinging, that's not really a bad trade off.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests