Gus Mueller wrote:Niall,
Because you're not a lost cause I'm going to keep drilling and trying to clarify. I've edited your stuff for brevity.
Niall Keane wrote:Gus Mueller wrote:...
This one video is real, but sold in a fake way. All the other hopping videos are fake, fake, fake, sold in a fake, fake, fake way.
Niall Keane wrote:Ah, I can see it's quite different from the run of the mill hoppy videos. But it is being presented as validation for such. I have no idea what the coach is training and so I have to fall back on previous clips and statements by the hoppy brigade. As such I'm asking them for valid martial reasons as to why to train and condition a fighter to hop autmonically / reflexively.
You're missing the point. WLC is exploiting reflexes in this demo. He's exploiting stuff that the student cannot train, and cannot control.
If it's some sort of - lock up your body this once to get to feel of "connection" or whatever and NEVER do it in combat then fair enough, but that is not what those who practice theatrical tuishou in the park where a slight twitch sends opponents flying is about.
I'm call in out the Woo woo lads to explain their incredible claims.
A worthy cause, Mr. Bigglesworth.
As for involuntary reflexes... well... even a doctor must have a few trys with a cooperative sitting relaxed patient.
Sorry, no, absolutely not true. Babinski reflex. All the test requires is a live baby. Babies cannot sit. REFLEXES DO NOT REQUIRE COOPERATION. In the case of the knee-jerk (patellar) reflex, the stretching of the the thigh muscle causes alpha neurons to fire, which sends an impulse to the lumbar part of the spine, which fires back an impulse to kick the leg. It never hits the brain.
It's a lot esier to have an opponent resist in one direction and switch to another empty of power and structure... lead him to the void and all. Tuishou excels at ingraining such tactics. You see all good wresters use the concept in every match Same with must thai clinch artists, sanda fighters and mma lads . Conversely you dont see spastic motions brought on by utilizing involuntary reflexes in combat sports.
I believe that some styles of tai chi, particularly some branches of yang style have been so long removed from competively testing their art that delusion has crept in. Tuishou has become the aim rather than a drill ...
I would say tuishou has become very bad stand-up jacketless wrestling. Imagine doing pushups. Pushups are good. Now imagine someone standing over you, pushing down on you, trying to prevent you from doing pushups. That's how tuishou is currently done.
I think there's some crossed wires here...
I understand about reflexes, in Pat Horse High a standard application is to carress the spine downwards as the face is lifted and rotated about the head (if you get me). this tricks the body into believing it is being supported and so collapses the spinal structure. you can drop someone with two little fingers with this "trick".
BUT... doing it to a training partner is one thing, even with mild resistance, but doing it to a lad who wants to knock you out and can move is work too fine for the butchery that is fighting. If you fuck up youre in the shit and fucking up is faiirly easy with such demands for accuracy, we all have bad days. Now you can instead even with gloves on latterally push with a twist the back of his hip and simultaneously carve accross the chest or do that face rotation thing and his structure will be broken, add a trip or hip throw and well...
Wang Cheng-nan famously stated "martial arts proceeds from the complex to the simple" and I can understand the necessity of the complex demands of the "lies to children" in training a martial art, but there comes a time when real life and all its ugliness must be catered for, a time to forget the dim-mak movies and realise "i gotta drop this guy, and I cant be taking unnecessary risks using techniques that demand error-free application" . SO for me anyway, although I will have students first train the orthodox pat horse high, and develop some accuracy and later show them the more "fail-safe" alternative, I am reminded of my Sifu's advice about "aim for the stars and you may reach the moon, aim for the moon and you will fail to leave the earth".
So if someone is seeking to achieve better accuracy from their students good stuff. The classic "lies to children" is how boxers train hooks and weight trandfer and how they are executed in professional fights. But the "lie" is useful training. I can accept that.
What I have issues with is the conditioning of a student to commit martial error, as suggested by the hoppy brigade. hopping to avoid force even to a position of 50-50 neutrality is just bad gung fu. the classics teach us to listen, TRANSFORM and issue force, many mistranslate such as "neutralise". In the Fighter's Song we have clear direction with the five close-quarter strategies: Nian ( sticking / adherence), Lian (continuous and connected), Mian (cotton, i.e. softness), Sui (to follow or allow, not simply yielding as sui can be in any direction in response to the opponent) and Bu Diu Ding (not to lose / abandon (thus allowing for a fresh attack) or to oppose (brutishly) )
hopping back, especially if conditioned to be autonomic in response means transformation is impossible, as contact has been lost. Hopping definately contradicts 4 of the 5 close quarter strategies Nian, Lian, Sui and Bu Diu Ding for sure and probably Mian by the look at the stiffness of the hoppers.
As such whatever they are practicing is not classical Tai Chi Chuan.
When we see multiple hops and hear of chi-magic well... we are deep within the asylum then!
I'd say we see eye to eye on much of the above?
As for tuishou competitions.. it depends on the competitions. The ICBA ones I help run in Ireland are open to all styles so we have McGreggor's SBG team mates down, BJJ lads, Judo Lads, other MMA lads too, and of course gung fu and tai chi lads and lassies even some Muay Thai lads wanting to explore clinch dynamics from other perspectives. The rules are basic, 1 point for a push out / off the mats or leitai, 2 points for a half fall, 4 for a full fall, 8 points for throwing the opponent aerially out of the area. a single 2 minute round. I've trained several national champs and some have gone on to be international champs in tuishou even TCFE European in their "open moving step" (a little more restricted than Irish rules).
The approach elevates tuishou to a decent test of skill against decent opposition, and it can be interesting for people. I had a student in his 40's defeat a national sanda champ in his mid-20's by 8-0, in fairness Marc did go on to be European Heavy Weight Champ. But in that environment there is a lot of mutual respect and everyone learns, quite different from the restricted fixed step tuishou plagued by rules designed by SIfu's seeking to advantage their own students.
SO I respect your criticism, but suggest that there may well be more to tuishou than you realise. BTW... I was talking of the drill type originally, not the freestyle competitive type.
Did you notice the lack of response to my suggestion that someone of the hoppy style enter a comp and demonstrate the skills use?
I guess it too will be met with "my door is always open " response, which of course is a cop out. For myself, right now, I'm using RSF as a break from my annual online tax returns. Running an architectural practice and having three boys under 6 and another on the way doesn't leave much time for applying for visas and traveling half way around the world to "exchange" with someone advocating magic and offering nothing else. My students wont be interested, they are focused on winning Tuishou and sanda Europeans and worlds, not on some unknown professing chi-power. Time is capital we don't get back! In fairness we all have busy lives, and my fight record absolves me from any bullshit about "daring to cross hands" This ain't the shaw brothers, its real life, why can't these lads just feckin do the obvious and easiest option, like I did and many others, go with nature and all, enter a feckin comp? They go on about things being "just kick-boxing" so I would expect to see a recognizable stylistic differences between typical sanda / mma and what they do, and some hops maybe? , even subtle ones to confound their opponents. I expect once connected in a clinch the opponent should be putty in their hands being hopped all over the lei tai at their mercy, as previously described about far riskier bouncer situations. It could be a goldmine for them, I'll be straight on to some of the worlds top MMA and K1 coaches in my contact list and be pushing that they have a look at this new game-changer!
I could get them an audience with John Kavanagh no problem, we go back, there's mutual respect between us there, I don't know McGreggor personally but who knows within a few weeks they could be part of his coaching team. Imagine that? coaching the UFC's most valuable fighter? They're always open to progress and new methods
that deliver down at SBG Ireland. One of their main coaches is a tai chi brother of mine, and many of my students have cross-trained with theirs, so the door is open
if you can deliver. I can make this happen no problem!
There's coaches begging for such a chance! ( on that note everyone else please don't start PMing me about it
)
What do you think Gus? will we be seeing some of their fight highlights soon?