Most likely not. The man has met some heavy hitters in the IMA circles and they vetted him and most of the people I know have vetted him and say he has serious skills. I trust the man's opinion to a certain degree. The rest of the people here are a bunch of names on the internet whose opinions I could care less for.
well I guess my point was missed.
I know many people most unknown in the west who are very capable with their art.
What one finds in what he says kind of depends on ones own level and training. I've always found what he posted interesting as it reflected
many of the same things that I've heard from other sources.
Names on the "net" this is a place I come to just to talk shop...
I really don't pay to much attention to what is posted or written some I agree with some I don't.
Dan, nor any one else here IMO has nothing to prove...nor needs to.
His clip showed very nice movement. He has good control of his space and moves with it,
understanding how to move with in it.
The transitions between what might be called traditional and modern useage was well done and very clear, showing a quickness in movement
and adaptive strategy using inner principles of movement combined with relevant usage based on current modern combative arenas.
Those asking to see other things used in a fee form environment I would suggest reviewing and looking at the clips again.
He makes himself available to those who attend his seminars and brings to light IMA principles usage using a modern format.
In this aspect he is probably among others in the field, a forerunner in the development of IMA making it accessible to the gen public.
all good stuff