RobP3 wrote:... but imagine a 10 volume set on "Deployment of a Manual Geomorphological Modification Implement"
My technical writing professor used to tell us to "eschew obfuscation".
RobP3 wrote:... but imagine a 10 volume set on "Deployment of a Manual Geomorphological Modification Implement"
oragami_itto wrote:
As to what makes it superior, in my opinion it is more sophisticated. Chen guys are powerful, no question. Strong, hard, rooted, nothing to fuck with. A good Yang guy will make you start to question the nature of your reality and whether free will as a meaningful concept can exist in a universe where something like that can happen to you.
willie wrote:oragami_itto wrote:
As to what makes it superior, in my opinion it is more sophisticated. Chen guys are powerful, no question. Strong, hard, rooted, nothing to fuck with. A good Yang guy will make you start to question the nature of your reality and whether free will as a meaningful concept can exist in a universe where something like that can happen to you.
Ah,about time itto...
Nice slogan, reminds of the old days with my Yang teacher.
More sophisticated? And what excatly are you basing your personal experience on?
Yang guy makes me question reality? What are you basing that comment on?
The question that I asked you is...
You said Yang improved Chen, as in superior too. Now because i know personally that this statement is completely false, I can calmly and confidently
ask you "what are the exact improvements" "in what way has it been modified to make it superior" "what was the exact origin of those falsies."
Do you know that people think that if you put a car battery on concrete, The earth shorts out the battery and kills it? It's not true, but this falsehood
spread everywhere and people believe its true. It was only a false rumor...
So seeing how you said "utter bullshit," when i so kindly tried to correct a couple small errors. Would you kindly express as to how or where you got
you information from, by kindly answering the questions that you yourself created?
Thanks
Bao wrote:DuncanBP wrote:oragami_itto wrote:Or that a married man with a full time job, an 18 month old daughter, and another one due on Wednesday...
Congrats on the new arrival. Try to get some sleep, while you can.
Congratulations from me as well. Cherish every moment you can spend together with your daughter.If there were any blame to be placed for neutering Yang Taijiquan it would be somewhere in the Yang Chien Hou, Cheng Fu, Cheng Man Ching.
CMC taught self defense. Li Yaxuan, YCF's best student taught, and wrote many practical advice for, fighting.
I would blame the gov for watering down CMA and promoting Tai Chi as a health exercise and trying to control teachers about what they teach and how.
oragami_itto wrote:You tell me what the difference is between Chen and Yang.
oragami_itto wrote:Thank you for the congratulations, the girl's are why I practice.willie wrote:oragami_itto wrote:
As to what makes it superior, in my opinion it is more sophisticated. Chen guys are powerful, no question. Strong, hard, rooted, nothing to fuck with. A good Yang guy will make you start to question the nature of your reality and whether free will as a meaningful concept can exist in a universe where something like that can happen to you.
Ah,about time itto...
Nice slogan, reminds of the old days with my Yang teacher.
More sophisticated? And what excatly are you basing your personal experience on?
Yang guy makes me question reality? What are you basing that comment on?
The question that I asked you is...
You said Yang improved Chen, as in superior too. Now because i know personally that this statement is completely false, I can calmly and confidently
ask you "what are the exact improvements" "in what way has it been modified to make it superior" "what was the exact origin of those falsies."
Do you know that people think that if you put a car battery on concrete, The earth shorts out the battery and kills it? It's not true, but this falsehood
spread everywhere and people believe its true. It was only a false rumor...
So seeing how you said "utter bullshit," when i so kindly tried to correct a couple small errors. Would you kindly express as to how or where you got
you information from, by kindly answering the questions that you yourself created?
Thanks
Willie,
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I stated my opinion, your opinion is different, they're both worth about half what it costs to read them.
You tell me what the difference is between Chen and Yang.
charles wrote:
Is there some pure, unadulturated absolute that uniquely defines each of these things, or is just a bunch of principles that individual practitioners attempt to comprehend, interpret and implement? And, by what objective criteria do you assess who is "better" at comprehending, interpreting and implementing those principles?
charles wrote:oragami_itto wrote:You tell me what the difference is between Chen and Yang.
The Chen as practiced by whom? The Yang as practiced by whom? ]
oragami_itto wrote:I honestly can't say anything about the taijiquan anybody else teaches or expresses. If it works to get you what you want then more power to you. I was only saying that, hypothetically, IF it were water down it would have been somewhere in that line, not that it WAS or that any of them DID.
Beginning in the 1950’s I was assigned to assist Professor Cheng in his advance internal body training which is to absorb a punch while he is asleep. This intensive training was carried out three times a day early morning, noon and late in the evening. I arrived at his house early in the morning and did not leave until late at night. This gave me a great opportunity to understand Professor Cheng’s lifestyle and martial arts skill. Every day, I listened to his lectures and his answers to questions about T’ai Chi Ch’uan asked by students and visitors who streamed to his house. I realized there are many advantages of staying in the Master’s house.
willie wrote:wrong...
cc chen i believe uses k1 for fighting.
CMC much over rated.
Tai Chi is only a set of principles.
totally incorrect.
Users browsing this forum: zrm and 40 guests