wayne hansen wrote:
So is that the way it goes if someone points something out that is obvious
You all make excuses for the practicioner then attack the person who points it out
wayne hansen wrote:I think it's fine for people not to have famous teachers or videos
But when they ask me to show something I reply in kind
wayne hansen wrote:
Everyone here who has said how bad it is should now post a clip of themselves doing better
Interloper wrote:Bao wrote:
Maybe because he was in a “talking mode”?
Internal method is reliant on mindfulness and awareness, which drive intent. For this stuff to "work" in combat, you have to train your mind to maintain your internal structure, even when moving and fighting. Being able to maintain structure and harmonizing forces and movement within your body while talking should be much easier, but I guess there are always distractions.
wayne hansen wrote:Taking the third one out of context aren't we
Trick wrote:Interloper wrote:Bao wrote:
Maybe because he was in a “talking mode”?
Internal method is reliant on mindfulness and awareness, which drive intent. For this stuff to "work" in combat, you have to train your mind to maintain your internal structure, even when moving and fighting. Being able to maintain structure and harmonizing forces and movement within your body while talking should be much easier, but I guess there are always distractions.
Ever tried to discuss or verbally explain something while seriously fighting? me neither
Interloper wrote:My point being, maintaining internal structure while talking, demonstrating, and teaching should not be difficult to an experienced practitioner. Can you talk and drive a car at the same time?
Maintaining while in combat, is way more demanding, of course. So, train for combat by incrementally increasing duress in sparring, etc. Testing your focus by teaching while demonstrating, is a gentle way to determine whether you can hold all of your body mechanisms even while talking.Trick wrote:Interloper wrote:
Internal method is reliant on mindfulness and awareness, which drive intent. For this stuff to "work" in combat, you have to train your mind to maintain your internal structure, even when moving and fighting. Being able to maintain structure and harmonizing forces and movement within your body while talking should be much easier, but I guess there are always distractions.
Ever tried to discuss or verbally explain something while seriously fighting? me neither
Trick wrote:Ever tried to discuss or verbally explain something while seriously fighting?
Trick wrote:Interloper wrote:Yes, but you mentioned Fighting
Interloper wrote:Trick wrote:Interloper wrote:Yes, but you mentioned Fighting
Maintaining internal structure and being able to use power and force derived from its processes, are things that require focused training and conditioning, through incremental increases in duress. Talking and maintaining is one level of duress. Certain kinds of randori and freesparring are another. Escalating practices in applied "street" combatives are yet another. They are all related but represent different stages and ways of introducing "distractions" that test and condition your ability to apply internal methods in extreme situations.
Bao wrote:
The problem is not completely about focus, but rather about breath.
Driving a car and talking is easy because change of breathing pattern doesn’t affect your ability to drive.
Punching when talking is hard because you don’t control your breath. ( it will be no good power)
If you balance and talk, your balance must adjust to the breath. It depends on how you talk. If you talk from the stomach it’s easy. If you tense the chest or neck, you can lose balance.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests