Andy_S wrote:This idea of being at constant danger of attacked inside and when seated: Really? How often did this happen, compared to incidents of being attacked when one is on one's feet?
The question still stands: Why were Japanese more at risk of being attacked while sitting compared to Chinese, Koreans, Thais, etc, who spend little (or any) training time preparing for this eventuality.
I am sure there are McKinley's in today's world who practice SD from a barstool - after all, being spanked in a boozer is a pretty common occurance. But I would be surprised if it took up more than 1 percent of their time.
Thinking out loud, I wonder if it is a ritual conceit....? After all, many MA classes in Japan start with sitting mediation and bowing, etc, etc, so it might make sense to start your practice from said position. But that does not reflect tactical likelihood ("Ah, so! Always be prepared to be attacked when sitting...") it reflects dojo tradition.
This is my take on it!
This is a lot of stuff in Japanese culture that is 'hidden' (not shown in public) and seiza is part of that culture.
People were often killed/assinated in that position and it became part of 'dojo culture' to train in techniques where you would be attacked from/in. It has persisted to this day just as rice culture must be maintained as saki as cultural identity b carried into the future! Even though Japanese culture was one of the first Asian cultues to (extrnally) modernize, the cultural traits remain in place!
When fascism comes to US America, It will be wrapped in the US flag and waving a cross. An astute patriot