Holm vs. Rousey

Rum, beer, movies, nice websites, gaming, etc., without interrupting the flow of martial threads.

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby yeniseri on Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:44 am

Great encounter for both!
I noticed Rousey had a high body fat (eyeball test!)and she seemed to move with "forced energy" while lacking her usual spritely demeanour. The only way to beat a grappler is to stay away while developing the striking game (as in boxing). Holm's strategy of staying away while strengtherning her own toolbox served her well.
When fascism comes to US America, It will be wrapped in the US flag and waving a cross. An astute patriot
yeniseri
Wuji
 
Posts: 3814
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:49 pm
Location: USA

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby shawnsegler on Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:51 am

GrahamB wrote:
Wanderingdragon wrote:Striking over grappling everytime.


She's 12 - 1 now so that's one time out of every 13 actually..., :-p


Not supporting the "every time" quote, but FWIW the 12-1 out of 13 as a determinent of the value of one or the other doesn't really hold water since not one of those first 12 was any sort of challenge. They were all ridiculously 1 sided.

Just sayin.

S
I prefer
You behind the wheel
And me the passenger
User avatar
shawnsegler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 6423
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: The center of things.

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Mr_Wood on Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:23 am

Holm took her to pieces, I think a rematch would be just as good if not better with a similar outcome.
The sky will punish you
User avatar
Mr_Wood
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1994
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Ba-men on Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:45 pm

GrahamB wrote:
Wanderingdragon wrote:Striking over grappling everytime.


She's 12 - 1 now so that's one time out of every 13 actually..., :-p



Agreed... and I'm a striker.

Just the talk of striking over grappling kinda makes me cringe.. Holms grappled big time. Maybe her takedown defense or the many counters against Rousey game got lost by the masses...
But what I saw was Holm's grappling skill making it possible for her to enact her game plan (her stand up) upon Rousey. Can't strike when your flat on your back... Can't strike when your clueless how to defend yourself on the ground.

All that said...

Holms said pre fight that she wasn't in the same class as all the other fighters Rousey has fought. (that showed....big time) Given Rousey pre fight antics... (very un Rousey like) was Rousey intimidated by Holms?

With Holms being a World champion in boxing with a strong pedigree in kick boxing.. Rousey IMO is in trouble of getting defeated twice... You can't teach that hand skill..to the level of world class.... You either have it or not. And Holm's grappling looks strong enough to thwart Rousey's world class grappling long enough to get stood up... which amounts to Advantage Striker... (such is the way of the current UFC rule set) I think Rousey would have the advantage "Big time" under the original UFC rule set. 20 min rds... no standing combatants up... Makes for one boring fight though. I remember watching Gracie and Shamrock roll around for what seemed forever! just to have a draw declared.
User avatar
Ba-men
Wuji
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby tastydurian on Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:52 pm

I have to admit that the KO was damn satisfying due to Ronda's cocky behavior and her psychotic antics at the weigh-in. That said I admit I only started watching WMMA due to Ronda with the first Miesha fight back in Strikeforce and hope the loss was a wakeup call to make some changes. Her judo really is beautiful to watch.
Last edited by tastydurian on Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tastydurian
Anjing
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:55 am

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Ian on Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:12 am

Wanderingdragon wrote:Striking over grappling everytime.


Not according to reality:

Image
Ian

 

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby GrahamB on Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:51 am

Ba-men wrote:
GrahamB wrote:
Wanderingdragon wrote:Striking over grappling everytime.


She's 12 - 1 now so that's one time out of every 13 actually..., :-p



Agreed... and I'm a striker.

Just the talk of striking over grappling kinda makes me cringe.. Holms grappled big time. Maybe her takedown defense or the many counters against Rousey game got lost by the masses...
But what I saw was Holm's grappling skill making it possible for her to enact her game plan (her stand up) upon Rousey. Can't strike when your flat on your back... Can't strike when your clueless how to defend yourself on the ground.

All that said...

Holms said pre fight that she wasn't in the same class as all the other fighters Rousey has fought. (that showed....big time) Given Rousey pre fight antics... (very un Rousey like) was Rousey intimidated by Holms?

With Holms being a World champion in boxing with a strong pedigree in kick boxing.. Rousey IMO is in trouble of getting defeated twice... You can't teach that hand skill..to the level of world class.... You either have it or not. And Holm's grappling looks strong enough to thwart Rousey's world class grappling long enough to get stood up... which amounts to Advantage Striker... (such is the way of the current UFC rule set) I think Rousey would have the advantage "Big time" under the original UFC rule set. 20 min rds... no standing combatants up... Makes for one boring fight though. I remember watching Gracie and Shamrock roll around for what seemed forever! just to have a draw declared.


I agree, Rousey is never going to match Holm standing, but I think she needs to work more on wrestling to get the take downs. It was evident that her Judo relies too much on the upper body clinch which Holm is never going to let her get. If she could shoot for a double leg with ease it would add another string to her bow.

(He says with zero fight experience in MMA :) )
One does not simply post on RSF.
The Tai Chi Notebook
User avatar
GrahamB
Great Old One
 
Posts: 13646
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Michael on Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:47 am

Ian wrote:
Wanderingdragon wrote:Striking over grappling everytime.


Not according to reality:

Image

How do we know what percentage of submissions were set up by striking? Or what percentage of TKO/KO/Stoppage was due to striking? Or decisions, for that matter? :o :D

/ accurate sarcasm
Michael

 

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby GrahamB on Mon Nov 16, 2015 4:19 am

Great brakedown of how Holm countered Rhonda using.... er...grappling... ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3stwtCmWTA

One does not simply post on RSF.
The Tai Chi Notebook
User avatar
GrahamB
Great Old One
 
Posts: 13646
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Strange on Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:02 am

抗兵相若 哀家胜
when the strength of 2 armies are equal; the aggrieved party wins
天官指星 单对月 风摆荷叶 影成双

岳武穆王以枪为拳, 六合形意李门世根, 形意拳五行为先, 论身法六合为首,少揽闲事心田静, 多读拳谱武艺精 - 李洛能 (形意拳谱)
User avatar
Strange
Great Old One
 
Posts: 5583
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 am

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby yeniseri on Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:13 am

GrahamB wrote:Great brakedown of how Holm countered Rhonda using.... er...grappling... ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3stwtCmWTA



Holm knew she could not come out cold and subdue Rousey because that was Rousey's skill so (just a guess ??? ) she had to maintain 'a distance' to wear Rousey down (who did not appear spirited at all as she looked confused and stumped after a few hits!). Holm, to succeed, had to always move away then come back to "test" see how the striking was doing and when Rousey was "weak" enough, Holm pounced at the opportunty we saw at the end. My imperfect observation may be off but it seemed close to what I observed. For Holm to stay within the reach of Rousey, it would have had a different ending

Just to add that she fought the same way she trained...BTW there is a short of some of her training routine since she started out as a kickboxer but complemented it with striking (boxing/fistacuffs)
Last edited by yeniseri on Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
When fascism comes to US America, It will be wrapped in the US flag and waving a cross. An astute patriot
yeniseri
Wuji
 
Posts: 3814
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:49 pm
Location: USA

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Ah Louis on Mon Nov 16, 2015 12:05 pm

I am going to say this, it's simply entertainment. Rousey, it was know she was preparing for the big (Mayweather) showdown with Cyborg. Rousey took the fight thinking (believing the hype) she could work her stand up skills. It was evident Rousey was set on not relaying on her grappling skills to win the fight. She wanted a K.O. not thinking she would be buying the K.O.

I agree she had more body fat, another indicator besides fighting Holms, Rousey was preparing for Cyborg. During the fight, it was clear Rousey could take a punch but couldn't withstand the punishment. Holms hard planted strikes took a toll fluctuating Rousey's stamina and lucidity.

Rousey wasn't delivering her grappling goods. She let Holms off easy allowing the fight to return to stand up. Where Rousey was indicated she lack of stand up skill. Rousey was out matched.

Rousey's fatal mistake was her under estimation of an opponent fighting in a style she isn't experienced at, and her opponent's fight as a way to promote the Cyborg fight. The UFC is in the business of entertainment, just like a movie studio. They all under estimated that Holms would go off script and K.O. a battered Rousey.

Rousey is no longer a fighter, she is an entertainer for the UFC. She has the ego of a Diva, believing her own hype. She has greedy agents, money mongering managers, and bottom-line studio all around her she is listening too making bad career decisions. Fame is what K.O. Rousey long before Holms K.O. her. Holms was hungry, raw and focused. Rousey wasn't. She was fat and comfortable on the top, believing no one could beat her. The most dangerous place to be, as Holms pointed out.
Ah Louis

 

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Michael on Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:31 pm

GrahamB wrote:Great brakedown of how Holm countered Rhonda using.... er...grappling... ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3stwtCmWTA

Enjoyed the analysis.
Michael

 

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby Andy_S on Mon Nov 16, 2015 7:54 pm

Frankly surprised that Rousey, with her vaunted BJJ skills, did not utilize BJJ Lesson #1 - ie how to get up from the deck.

Instead, she turned her back on her oppo - a beginner error - and turned into Holms' head kick. Sweet dreams.
Services available:
Pies scoffed. Ales quaffed. Beds shat. Oiks irked. Chavs chinned. Thugs thumped. Sacks split. Arses goosed. Udders ogled. Canines consumed. Sheep shagged.Matrons outraged. Vicars enlightened. PM for rates.
User avatar
Andy_S
Great Old One
 
Posts: 7559
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 6:16 pm

Re: Holm vs. Rousey

Postby tastydurian on Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:41 pm

Possibly one of the funniest fan videos of the fight: http://www.thrillon.com/tag/joe-rogan-b ... om-ufc-193

Also, the Street Fighter edit:

Last edited by tastydurian on Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tastydurian
Anjing
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:55 am

PreviousNext

Return to Off the Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests