Michael wrote:Steve James wrote:Remember that Russia entered Ukraine to, they say, to protect ethnic Russians.
Yeah, but the Russians didn't shoot down any, er, uhm, any Turkish planes.
Or in Ukraine
Michael wrote:Steve James wrote:Remember that Russia entered Ukraine to, they say, to protect ethnic Russians.
Yeah, but the Russians didn't shoot down any, er, uhm, any Turkish planes.
windwalker wrote:What steve, wrote is also what I thought. After reading about the SU-24.
At any rate a first and last time for any Russian plane to get caught like this again.
Deadly 'Russian airstrike' hits market in Syria's Idlib
At least 44 people killed and scores wounded in air attack on popular marketplace in town of Ariha, activists say.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/11/2 ... 03978.html
Sophie Shevardnadze: Wolfgang Schussel former Chancellor and foreign minister of Austria, welcome to the show, it's really great to have you with us. Now, a NATO country, Turkey, has shot down a Russian bomber in Syria, claiming it strayed into Turkish airspace. When a Turkish plane was shot for violating Syrian airspace, mr. Erdogan dubbed it an "attack with no excuse" - now, when a Russian plane is shot by Turkey in similar circumstances, it's an "appropriate self-defence". How this ambiguous stance of a NATO member and an EU candidate is viewed in Europea? Why is Turkey changing its stance when it feels like it? What's European take on that?
Wolfgang Schussel: I think it's a nightmare incident, what happened a few days ago. This is exactly what some military experts warned about - there were repeated warning that there could be a clash between two nations in this already overcrowded Syrian sky. I think, what is needed is more cooperation and coordination. And, I think, the response of Turkey, even if there would be some incidents, let's say, for 2-5 seconds crossing a border land, it's not an appropriate reaction for that. So, I think, what is needed is a military coordination in this very disputed area.
Michael wrote:Why is it more certain that Turkey would attack Russian planes, because they have fighter escorts? I would have thought the overall situation now would mean the opposite, that because of increased Russian military capability with SU-400, missile destroyer, fighter escort, and political advantage, Turkey would be less likely to attack under similar circumstances they recently claimed as self-defense, such as the 17 second incursion.
Why is it more certain that Turkey would attack Russian planes
Steve James wrote:Why is it more certain that Turkey would attack Russian planes
If Russian planes intrude into Turkey, yes it's certain Turkey will respond. C'mon, if Turkish bombers çross into Russia, what would happen?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests