Bao wrote:A professor I met was very seriously about this and told me that we might belong to one of the few last generations that need to die out of old age.
Dmitri wrote:Bao wrote:A professor I met was very seriously about this and told me that we might belong to one of the few last generations that need to die out of old age.
Hope springs eternal... ideas similar to "fountain of youth" have been around forever.
Did he mention at what age we would all be "fixed"? 20? 30? 40? What's the Goldilocks Age?
The real problem is entropy, and I just can't see any way around it. Everything changes.
I can see a (very remote) possibility of developing technology to sustain a reasonably functioning brain "indefinitely" while it's hooked up to some machine that continuously feeds nutrients and medications into it keeping cells from falling apart, but even that's a big stretch. But let's say it were possible -- I'm not so sure anyone would want that kind of "life" anyway.
Steve James wrote:Every living thing has a programmed "death gene," and its purpose is to ensure the continuation of Life, not that particular individual. Life only continues because things die. Quality of individual life, regardless of length, is much more important. That said, living longer is always a goal.
Steve James wrote:Life only continues because things die.
Dmitri wrote:Steve James wrote:Life only continues because things die.
Not sure I follow...
Bao wrote:Have you seen Galaxy express 999?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests