chud wrote:At this point I just don't see how she will not be charged.
I know the Clintons always get away with everything, but the evidence is just overwhelming.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/30/us/politics/22-clinton-emails-deemed-too-classified-to-be-made-public.html?_r=1
With that said, Clinton deserves to get beaten over the head with this issue throughout the election. It is concerning that any official State Department communication was occurring on non-government devices, particularly the Secretary of State. And if she knowingly sent out any classified material, she deserves to be prosecuted for it
chud wrote:
Here's the deal: last Friday the State Department revealed (on a Friday, as usual) that it found 22 emails on her server that were labeled Top Secret when she got them.
When she received them, they were marked Top Secret.
But Monday afternoon, after her campaign workers lobbied their former colleagues at the DoS, the State Department said that they weren't all labeled Top Secret.
Look at Iowa; Hillary barely beat Bernie Sanders (by a coin toss) and she's had her campaign machine in place since 2008.
She should have been able to beat an acknowledged socialist easily, but instead she is feelin' the Bern.
People don't find her trustworthy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests