Meanwhile back at the ranch

Rum, beer, movies, nice websites, gaming, etc., without interrupting the flow of martial threads.

Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby KEND on Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:16 am

Meanwhile while all attention is focused on a mentally disturbed killer Monsanto once again got their 'get out of jail free' card' and not a word about it anywhere. More of the same under Clinton, who is already on the payroll. And you need more reasons to support Bernie

MONSANTO PROTECTION ACT
Signed By Obama, GMO Bill “Written By Monsanto” Signed Into Law
Global Research, May 25, 2013
The Monsanto Protection Act, essentially both written by and benefiting Monsanto Corporation, has been signed into law by United States President Barack Obama. The infamous Monsanto Corporation will benefit greatly and directly from the bill, as it essentially gives companies that deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and genetically engineered (GE) seeds immunity to the federal courts, among other things.
The bill states that even if future research shows that GMOs or GE seeds cause significant health problems, cancer, etc, anything, that the federal courts no longer have any power to stop their spread, use, or sales.
There are of course arguments to be made that not enough research has been done yet to accurately determine the effects that GMOs have on human and animal health (though the research already done should make you stop and think). This bill sidesteps that completely though, and simply states that even if there are problems, that the federal courts can no longer do anything about it. And this bill is now law, thanks to President Obama and the U.S. Congress.
Some other interesting things to keep in mind:
- The bill was apparently written by freshman Sen. Roy Blunt in collusion with Monsanto, with them helping to craft the exact language of the document.
- “The Center for Responsive Politics notes that Sen. Blunt received $64,250 from Monsanto to go towards his campaign committee between 2008 and 2012. The Money Monocle website adds that Blunt has been the largest Republican Party recipient of Monsanto funding as of late.”
- Many members of Congress were apparently unaware that the “Monsanto Protection Act” was a part of the spending bill that they were voting on.
- Obama had no problem signing it into law (not really a surprise, he’s been rather soft on GMO policy).
- The bill will only remain in effect for a limited time, but it’s a bad sign. With the ease that this bill passed, it’ll be interesting to see what future bills look like
As the Daily News asks, “Who’s more powerful, the world’s largest producer of genetically modified crops or the U.S. government?”

“On Tuesday, Pres. Obama inked his name to H.R. 933, a continuing resolution spending bill approved in Congress days earlier. Buried 78 pages within the bill exists a provision that grossly protects biotech corporations such as the Missouri-based Monsanto Company from litigation.”
“In light of approval from the House and Senate, more than 250,000 people signed a petition asking the president to veto the spending bill over the biotech rider tacked on, an item that has since been widely referred to as the ‘Monsanto Protection Act.’”
“But Obama ignored [the petition],” as the IB Times notes, “instead choosing to sign a bill that effectively bars federal courts from being able to halt the sale or planting of GMO or GE crops and seeds, no matter what health consequences from the consumption of these products may come to light in the future.”
GMOs, while they may cause problems for human health, are primarily a problem for other reasons, mostly to do with crop/genetic diversity and overly complex industrial systems. And also the fact that they often don’t even work the way that they are “supposed” to.
When taken in context though, GMOs are really just another in a long line of environmentally damaging practices that people have done for short term gain/profit. From the large-scale deforestation of the world’s old-growth forests, to sustenance farming, to modern imported-fertilizer/pesticide/herbicide/fossil-fuel dependent industrial agricultural, the trend has been consistent, GMOs are just another in that line of attempts to temporarily maintain/raise crop yields. Regardless of the type of agriculture or the location, there are limits to how long any land can remain productive, applying imported fertilizers, or utilizing GMOs, only provides, at best, a temporary halt to the land’s transition to non-productive “wasteland”, and to desertification.
KEND
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby jimmy on Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:39 am

wheat wrote:
tares wrote:
amaranthus palmeri wrote:fuck monsanto
Image
User avatar
jimmy
Wuji
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:24 pm

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby Steve James on Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:45 am

We need to change policy, but the profit motive is too strong.
"A man is rich when he has time and freewill. How he chooses to invest both will determine the return on his investment."
User avatar
Steve James
Great Old One
 
Posts: 21218
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:20 am

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby chud on Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:43 am

I recently read a really good science fiction novel called "The Windup Girl", in which a couple of large bio-engineering agri-conglomerates essentially dominate the world's markets. If your company's crops are resistant to the latest plague, then you control the food supply and thus the world.

Monsanto was smart to sneak this in while the Democrats controlled the White House; if they'd tried it under a Republican president there would have been more protest from the Left.
Last edited by chud on Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chud
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 7:42 am
Location: Alamo City, Lone Star State

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby Steve James on Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:33 pm

Monsanto was smart to sneak this in while the Democrats controlled the White House; if they'd tried it under a Republican president there would have been more protest from the Left.


:) 1) This Bill started in the Republican House, was passed by the Republican Senate; so, I kinda doubt that a Republican president would have vetoed it. 2) You're right that the Left would have made (or could have made) more protests. However, the Right didn't make any at all. 3) If the Left controlled the House and Senate, the Bill would have never made it to the President. ;)
"A man is rich when he has time and freewill. How he chooses to invest both will determine the return on his investment."
User avatar
Steve James
Great Old One
 
Posts: 21218
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:20 am

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Postby grzegorz on Fri Jun 17, 2016 12:55 am

Exactly, congress makes laws not the president. The president has the power to veto a law but can't create them.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
grzegorz
Wuji
 
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:42 pm
Location: America great yet?


Return to Off the Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests