another view of the bailout

Rum, beer, movies, nice websites, gaming, etc., without interrupting the flow of martial threads.

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby Michael on Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:58 am

Paulson Was Behind Bailout Martial Law Threat

Inhofe says Treasury Secretary made dire warnings in conference call on September 19th
Image

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, November 20, 2008

Senator James Inhofe has revealed that Henry Paulson was behind the threats of martial law and a new great depression prior to the passage of the bailout bill, having made such warnings during a conference call on September 19th, around two weeks before the legislation was eventually approved by both the Senate and Congress.

As we reported at the time, on October 2, Democratic Congressman Brad Sherman gave a stunning speech on the House floor during which he decried the fact that, “Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day, another couple of thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”

A few days before, Rep. Michael Burgess also told the House, “Mr. Speaker I understand we are under Martial Law as declared by the speaker last night,” referring to a temporary suspension of the rules and procedures of Congress by its leaders so that a bill can be passed quickly.

But the origin of the most dire warnings about physical martial law in America, to which Sherman was likely referring, has now been exposed.

Speaking on Tulsa Oklahoma’s 1170 KFAQ, when asked who was behind threats of martial law and civil unrest if the bailout bill failed, Senator James Inhofe named Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson as the source.

“Somebody in D.C. was feeding you guys quite a story prior to the bailout, a story that if we didn’t do this we were going to see something on the scale of the depression, there were people talking about martial law being instituted, civil unrest….who was feeding you guys this stuff?,” asked host Pat Campbell.

“That’s Henry Paulson,” responded Inhofe, “We had a conference call early on, it was on a Friday I think – a week and half before the vote on Oct. 1. So it would have been the middle … what was it – the 19th of September, we had a conference call. In this conference call – and I guess there’s no reason for me not to repeat what he said, but he said – he painted this picture you just described. He said, ‘This is serious. This is the most serious thing that we faced.’”

Inhofe said that Paulson told members of Congress the crisis would be “far worse than the great depression” if Congress didn’t authorize the bill to buy out toxic debt, a proposal “which he abandoned the day after he got the money,” added Inhofe.

Inhofe is referring to the controversy last week when it emerged that the bailout money was not going to buy up toxic debt but instead Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, had pulled a bait and switch and ordered the money be injected directly into banks.

Senator Inhofe has slammed the secrecy surrounding the destination of the bailout money, saying that Hank Paulson could have given it to his friends and that the “blank check” must be cancelled now.

Inhofe is now trying to rally support for a freeze on what’s left of the initial $350 billion of bailout money with his “roll back the bailout” proposal, which will also require an affirmative vote on the part of Congress to approve Treasury’s plan for the remaining $350 billion.

Watch the clip from Inhofe’s interview below.

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=e4qG2G6UkU
Michael

 

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby qiphlow on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:13 pm

why am i not surprised?
esoteric voodoo wizard
User avatar
qiphlow
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3925
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 9:09 am

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby chud on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:32 pm

What a shitbag.
I don't know if it's against the law for a gov't official to threaten martial law on the people of the United States in order to get money for their program, but it should be.
User avatar
chud
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 7:42 am
Location: Alamo City, Lone Star State

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby qiphlow on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:39 pm

edited for irrelevance
Last edited by qiphlow on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
esoteric voodoo wizard
User avatar
qiphlow
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3925
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 9:09 am

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby DeusTrismegistus on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:39 pm

Paulson should be impeached, tried, and hung. Extorting the US people is what he did. Funny how the general populace wasn't fooled while congress was. They should listen to the people more often.
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a

bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill
User avatar
DeusTrismegistus
Wuji
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 5:55 am

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby Michael on Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:17 pm

I heard some excerpts of House hearings with Paulson's former Goldman Sachs VP cum bailout manager, Kashkari. Kucinich, who voted against the bailout, slammed him. Issa of California, who voted against the bailout, blew him away, then Cummings of Maryland said Obama talked him into voting for the bailout but he was thinking he wished he could change his mind. Cummings sounded really, really weak.
Michael

 

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby Michael on Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:28 am

Bailout payout tops $8 trillion

It’s a package of about $8.7 trillion dollars’ worth of potential taxpayer commitments for loans, guarantees and other bailout goodies for businesses and distressed homeowners.


read the full article
Michael

 

Re: another view of the bailout

Postby shawnsegler on Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:18 am

I still say we could just go the aggro rout and say...look guys...you fucked up..no hard feelings, but we're going to liquidate the assets of everyone involved in the bush administration, as well as all the crooked companies that were involved...haliburton et al.

Seems reasonable and better for them than a noose...although that sounds like a pretty reasonable option too. I mean it is our country and we could just tank all those guys for all the cash they took. That is if they weren't still in charge.

S- cynical
I prefer
You behind the wheel
And me the passenger
User avatar
shawnsegler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 6423
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: The center of things.

Previous

Return to Off the Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests