Pacquiao Horn decision

Rum, beer, movies, nice websites, gaming, etc., without interrupting the flow of martial threads.

Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby everything on Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:10 pm

Apparently extremely controversial
https://www.si.com/boxing/2017/07/02/pa ... n-decision

Anyone catch it?
amateur practices til gets right pro til can't get wrong
/ better approx answer to right q than exact answer to wrong q which can be made precise /
“most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. Source of all true art & science
User avatar
everything
Wuji
 
Posts: 8307
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: USA

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby wayne hansen on Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:53 pm

Not here in Australia everyone seems to agree with the 3 international judges
Don't put power into the form let it naturally arise from the form
wayne hansen
Wuji
 
Posts: 5779
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby Steve James on Sun Jul 02, 2017 9:15 pm

Well, yeah, outside of Australia, the decision was controversial. Anyway, here's a report of the fight stats, no matter who was given the decision. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2719 ... -breakdown

I didn't watch the entire fight. So, I have no personal opinion about who won.
"A man is rich when he has time and freewill. How he chooses to invest both will determine the return on his investment."
User avatar
Steve James
Great Old One
 
Posts: 21200
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:20 am

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby marvin8 on Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:38 am

Here is the fight and scorecards. Close fight. No robbery.

Horn did a great job (e.g., movement, feints, control, recuperation). A draw or win for Horn is fair. Rematch should be fun.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhfpcth-bCs

Image
User avatar
marvin8
Wuji
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby junglist on Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:44 am

Robbery.

Horn was aggressive but didn't do anything with that aggression. Dude threw, missed, and was countered. Plus he should've been cautioned and maybe even fouled by the ref.
junglist
Anjing
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:42 am

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby marvin8 on Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:39 am

junglist wrote:Robbery.

Horn was aggressive but didn't do anything with that aggression. Dude threw, missed, and was countered. Plus he should've been cautioned and maybe even fouled by the ref.

Yes, I like to see trapping and control (e.g, head control, etc.) for self defense purposes, although they are borderline legal tactics. :D

Both had a few good clean shots (a lot of misses too), Pacquiao especially in the 9th round. Otherwise, it was kind of boring in that regards. I don't put much faith in the punch stats for this fight. Horn's awkward rhythm and feints made Pacquiao reset. I think Horn's team had a good game plan.

I don't understand or agree with Teddy Atlas and others who call this a robbery. Some others feel the same way:

An article Manny Pacquiao Vs. Jeff Horn: These 10 Credible People Don't Think Pac-Man Was Robbed from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianmaziq ... 46dcce6c35.

Published on Jul 2, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeMEn5QqVZM
User avatar
marvin8
Wuji
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby everything on Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:51 pm

ok thanks. so far by RSF judging it seems to be kind of split decision in favor of Horn:
- 3 for "no robbery" and
- 2 for either "robbery" or controversial

which makes me more curious to check it out.
amateur practices til gets right pro til can't get wrong
/ better approx answer to right q than exact answer to wrong q which can be made precise /
“most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. Source of all true art & science
User avatar
everything
Wuji
 
Posts: 8307
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: USA

Re: Pacquiao Horn decision

Postby marvin8 on Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:47 am

Five independent Judges from different countries re-score Pacquiao v. Horn.

Pacquiao-Horn Investigation: WBO Backs Scores, Explains Why from http://www.boxingscene.com/pacquiao-hor ... hy--118368:
By World Boxing Organization, Mon Jul 10, 2017 wrote:The Jeff Horn vs. Manny Pacquiao bout results were controversial causing disputes amongst fans. For this reason, transparency is so important.

The WBO does not have power to reverse the Judges decision based on discretion as it can only be revoked when fraud or a violation of Law has occurred, which is not relevant in this case.

Based on this, five (5) anonymous, competent Judges from different countries were asked to watch the bout without sound. Then, the independent results were tabulated to ascertain clearly the rounds each fighter won using an average scale based on 60, 80 and 100 percent.

To determine the winner of each round, 3 out of the 5 officials have to be in agreement.

Image

Upon the analysis, the findings stated that Pacquiao won the 3rd, the 8th and 9th by 100%; the 5th round was won by 80%; and the 11th round by 60%. Horn won the 1st, 6th and 12th rounds by 100%; rounds 2nd, 4th, and 7th by 80%; and then, the 10th round by 60%.

From the results, it can be established that Pacquiao won 5 rounds while Horn won 7 rounds.

The next step of the analysis was to combine the Independent Judges with the Bout Judges to find the percentage agreement by round. Upon doing this analysis, the findings of the Judges stated that Pacquiao won the 3rd and 9th by 100%; the 8th round was won by 87.5%; no rounds were won by 75%; the 5th round by 62.5%; and the 10th and 11th were even rounds.

On the other hand, the Judges findings stated that Horn won the 1st, 6th, and 12th rounds by 100%; by 87.5%, he won the 4th and the 7th; the 2nd was won by 75%; none were won by 62.5%; and the even rounds were the 10th and the 11th.

The analytical method utilized was also used in the decision of Algieri- Provodnikov and Paquiao-Bradley.

Based on this analysis, Jeff Horn was the winner of the bout.
Last edited by marvin8 on Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
marvin8
Wuji
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:30 pm


Return to Off the Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests