by Steve James on Fri Oct 27, 2017 4:15 pm
More damning? If it was about the election, who won? Suppose we just say that the Russians colluded to influence the election. Who should we be investigating?
Besides, the language used is often slippery. I.e., Trump will say that "he" never colluded with anyone; but, evidence shows clearly that members of staff and campaign sought help from Russia (even congratulated Wikileaks for releasing information gained from Russian sources). Otoh, though nothing has been produced showing direct meetings between Clinton and Russians, he'll say that "Hillary" colluded with them.
If Hillary were president, I'm sure this would be valid. As it is, the whole point is to end Mueller's investigation. And, if Hillary should be locked up, the same should happen to team Trump. It's also interesting how the president asks whether he can pardon his family and staff if they're found guilty.
It's just like the sexual harassment charges against Trump. The first thing he'll do is point to Bill Clinton.
"A man is rich when he has time and freewill. How he chooses to invest both will determine the return on his investment."