You are assuming that I agreed that Obama deserved a nobel peace prize. (See the why everyone on the internet is an ass thread.)
First of all nothing has officially happened except for a meeting between Kim and Moon. Did Trump do that?
Acoording to Trump the Olympics were a success because of him too.
I think the difference is because someone, the politicians, says something people believe it. I don't.
I think the reason why people are in a hurry to celebrate a Trump vicotry is because he has set the bar so low and the only thing he has accomplished is a huge corporate tax break giving us the greatest debt and deficit in history while the little guy gets bill.
Even under Reagan (who I am not a fan of) we would not have rushed out to give him a nobel peace prize before anything was actually accomplished. Remember Reagan and Gorbachev?
Ask yourself this question. When Koreans do all the work why should any American get all the credit? People do realize that peace with North Korea was what Moon ran on don't they?
Go ahead spike the football, but all this cheering and clapping reminds me of the most recent Republican president.
Does the draft dodger who refused to fight for his country deserve a Nobel Peace Prize? Let's give it some time and see what he actually does first and see how it all plays out.
I remember when I was doing a history paper on Poland's Solidarnosc movement and the Poles voted out the communists. When I told Americans they were convinced that the US was behind it but there has never been evidence of that. Yes, believe it or not the world goes on with or without us and thank god for that.
For me, the Nobel Peace Prize would go to the Koreans.
G
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire