dragontigerpalm wrote: Additionally, if rear choke holds and headlocks are the preferred method of extricating people from the bar then if you haven't all ready you will most likely at some point be down at the police station trying to explain your way out of assault charges and/or defending yourself in a civil suit.
meeks wrote:that's right. guy's claim could be:
I went out for a few drinks and fun with my friends at ###### bar. I got jumped by a couple of guys and while defending myself, the bar staff decided to put a strangle hold on me and slam my face into a door to open it.
you wouldn't have a hope in hell.
cerebus wrote:meeks wrote:that's right. guy's claim could be:
I went out for a few drinks and fun with my friends at ###### bar. I got jumped by a couple of guys and while defending myself, the bar staff decided to put a strangle hold on me and slam my face into a door to open it.
you wouldn't have a hope in hell.
I dunno. If you've been drinking when something goes down, get out or you will be automatically considered wrong (unless you can find a surveillance showing otherwise). Cops and judges have been dealing with drunks since the earliest days of law and that's about how long they've been out of patience with them. As a former cop, I can tell ya that whenever we would respond to a bar fight, if the guy who got roughed up by the bouncer had alcohol in him then he probably had it coming. Bouncers don't usually start trouble, 'cause they've got enough concerns without creating more of 'em...
dragontigerpalm wrote: IME, bouncers who use choke holds in any but the most dangerous situations ( I know and have worked with several) are or will be trouble and are a great liabilty.
hopgarsansau wrote:i have law school students who come in who think theyre all that because theyre in law school threaten me to do something when they mess around
truth is our bar is a PRIVATE setting OPEN to the public, therefore, there is very little police involvement, we arent worried about assault. (my friend high up in the austin police department confirmed this, APD always ignores drunk guys who want to file assault charges against a bouncer)
civil suits, maybe, but i am paid to regulate and kick people out when need be, and i never initiate the violence. I always warn them many times, and when a fight breaks out, i have to do whatever necessary to end it. (realize i didnt throw a single punch during the altercation). its not a prefered methow, but i would say 1/4 times, some level of physical violence is necessary to get the job done.
hopgarsansau wrote:i'd rather risk a civil suit under those circumstances than lose my job for not doing it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests