But mainly, I can't stand either alternative. Insurance is one of the biggest racketeering rings there is. I don't think I have to go into that. However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait. This is what happens in Europe. It is way too simple to think that we all will just put money into a big "pool" and when "SOMEONE" needs it they will get it. I don't want to pay for some fat slob who chooses not to take care of himself. It won't matter anyway because with the cost of health care, the "pool" will run dry real quick. OR everyone will have to be taxed much more, which I'm sure people will love.
Chris Fleming wrote:However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait.
Chris Fleming wrote: However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait. This is what happens in Europe.
grzegorz wrote:If we have money for wars we can have health care for the poor.
Yeah, yeah people can go on and one about the national debt like it's a religion but the reality is the national debt was there when we were born and it's going to be there when we all die.But mainly, I can't stand either alternative. Insurance is one of the biggest racketeering rings there is. I don't think I have to go into that. However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait. This is what happens in Europe. It is way too simple to think that we all will just put money into a big "pool" and when "SOMEONE" needs it they will get it. I don't want to pay for some fat slob who chooses not to take care of himself. It won't matter anyway because with the cost of health care, the "pool" will run dry real quick. OR everyone will have to be taxed much more, which I'm sure people will love.
Then why does France have the best health care in the world?
emre wrote:Chris Fleming wrote: However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait. This is what happens in Europe.
Have you ever lived in Europe?
Chris Fleming wrote:emre wrote:Chris Fleming wrote: However, socialist health care just ends up with people on long waiting lists for needed surgeries and perhaps dying in the wait. This is what happens in Europe.
Have you ever lived in Europe?
My wife lived in England for several years. I wrote about this particular story on the last time we debated this issue where a friend of hers needed a surgery and was sent away. She was told that they, the doctors, had done their limit of those kinds of procedures for that year and she had to come back. The woman did come back and was in a much worse condition and was asked by the doctors, "how come you waited so long to come in for surgery".
Chris Fleming wrote:The whole world system is designed to make you a slave to money and separate you from your money--thus making you all the more enslaved to money. I see "health care" as just another program operating in this system.
Chris Fleming wrote:Well that sucks too. Sounds like you got screwed by the world system I was just talking about--that's why I originally called health insurance a racketeering outfit. You pay and pay and pay and then they don't cover. It's just that some internet guy wondered if I had any basis for talking about European health care and another internet guy basically called me an idiot, so I posted the story about the friend of my wife again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests