Michael wrote:What I observe happening in the UK is also what I observe happening in the USA and I don't physically travel to either place to make these observations.
GrahamB wrote:edededed wrote:I have always enjoyed my stays in the UK (unfortunately, I have not had the opportunity to visit of late) - love the environs and love the food! Things are a bit too expensive, though...
Love the food? You don't hear that too often
edededed wrote:GrahamB wrote:edededed wrote:I have always enjoyed my stays in the UK (unfortunately, I have not had the opportunity to visit of late) - love the environs and love the food! Things are a bit too expensive, though...
Love the food? You don't hear that too often
I think it is because English folks never praise their own food (kind of similar to Americans, in a way, probably because of a lack of the kind of nationalism you often get in other countries), so noone ends up knowing WHAT it is you eat.
I have found things like beer-battered fish & chips, steak and ale pie, pasties, mushy peas, pease porridge, and so on quite delectable, actually (some interesting organ-based foods I tried (like chicken kidney) was, um, interesting, though) Was quite interesting eating things like scampi and flapjacks as well, as there are similarly-named things in the US, but they refer to completely different things. Finally, my wife and I liked Ribena as well, so I always bought about 8 bottles of that and lugged it back home, sweating and chugging all the way
My theory is that America was born when a bunch of somewhat culinarily-disabled English decided to emigrate... of course, everyone likes a good meal, so then they made do with what they did know how to cook (we did get shepherd's pie, roast beef, and chicken pot pie). Luckily, some German immigrants and Jewish immigrants and Italian immigrants and so on did know how to cook, and thus we got some good foods out of them...
mrtoes wrote:I didn't disagree with much you were saying in principle, just thought your exposition was a bit OTT considering it related to a poor piece of internet reportage about a D list celebrity that looks like it was either partly or completely inaccurate. Principles are all well and good but it's worth paying attention to the details before jumping to conclusions.
Cheers,
Matthew.
GrahamB wrote:Yeah, that's better. Thanks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests