test no topic

The following typical threads that plague martial arts sites will get moved here if not just deleted: 1 - My style is better than Your style" - 2 - "Internal & External" - 3 - Personal attacks - 4 - Threads that start well, but degenerate into a spiral of nonsense.

Re: test no topic

Postby Bill on Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:29 pm

Neil Armstrong was the first person to step on the moon.
"Neil A" spelled backwards is Alien.
It hurts when I Pi
User avatar
Bill
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4825
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:00 am

Re: test no topic

Postby Michael on Sun Oct 29, 2017 5:55 pm

A = 1
L = 12
i = 9
E = 5
N = 14

When you add all those together, it's exactly the same numerological value as Stanley Kubrick.
User avatar
Michael
Great Old One
 
Posts: 11502
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Guangzhou, China

Re: test no topic

Postby Dmitri on Sun Oct 29, 2017 6:56 pm

Also in case you were wondering, when you play Pink Floyd's 'Dark side of the Moon' backwards, the sum of all A notes equals Neil Armstrong's uncle's weight multiplied by the number of all Kubrick's movies to the power of 7. But only when you play it backwards. It's true!
User avatar
Dmitri
Great Old One
 
Posts: 9369
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA (USA)

Re: test no topic

Postby Michael on Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:25 am

User avatar
Michael
Great Old One
 
Posts: 11502
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Guangzhou, China

Re: test no topic

Postby Strange on Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:25 am

Image
天官指星 单对月 风摆荷叶 影成双
i said slowly and evenly; i did not say weakly
User avatar
Strange
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 am

Re: test no topic

Postby jimmy on Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:05 pm

Image
User avatar
jimmy
Wuji
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:24 pm

Re: test no topic

Postby grzegorz on Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:26 am

"Fascists rejected reason in the name of will, denying objective truth in favor of a glorious myth articulated by leaders who claimed to give voice to the people."

-Timothy Snyder
User avatar
grzegorz
Wuji
 
Posts: 4876
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:42 pm
Location: Divided States of America

Re: test no topic

Postby Dmitri on Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:17 am

Image
User avatar
Dmitri
Great Old One
 
Posts: 9369
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA (USA)

Re: test no topic

Postby Strange on Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:53 pm

天官指星 单对月 风摆荷叶 影成双
i said slowly and evenly; i did not say weakly
User avatar
Strange
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 am

Re: test no topic

Postby Strange on Fri Nov 03, 2017 4:03 pm

Image
天官指星 单对月 风摆荷叶 影成双
i said slowly and evenly; i did not say weakly
User avatar
Strange
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 am

Re: test no topic

Postby jimmy on Fri Nov 03, 2017 4:31 pm

User avatar
jimmy
Wuji
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:24 pm

Re: test no topic

Postby Strange on Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:59 am

Image
Diana and Rowan Atkinson
Last edited by Strange on Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
天官指星 单对月 风摆荷叶 影成双
i said slowly and evenly; i did not say weakly
User avatar
Strange
Great Old One
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 am

Re: test no topic

Postby Giles on Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:25 pm

Michael wrote:A = 1
L = 12
i = 9
E = 5
N = 14

When you add all those together, it's exactly the same numerological value as Stanley Kubrick.


I expect I'm being outstandingly uncool by asking the question, but what does "41" have to do numerologically with Stanley Kubrick ?
Do not make the mistake of giving up the near in order to seek the far.
Giles
Huajing
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:19 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: test no topic

Postby shawnsegler on Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:43 pm

I prefer
You behind the wheel
And me the passenger
User avatar
shawnsegler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 6471
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: The center of things.

Re: test no topic

Postby wiesiek on Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:32 am

Giles wrote:
Michael wrote:A = 1
L = 12
i = 9
E = 5
N = 14

When you add all those together, it's exactly the same numerological value as Stanley Kubrick.


I expect I'm being outstandingly uncool by asking the question, but what does "41" have to do numerologically with Stanley Kubrick ?


4+1= 5
SK is numerological 5
joyful usefullnes of the effords
User avatar
wiesiek
Wuji
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 12:38 am
Location: krakow

PreviousNext

Return to Been There Done That

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest