between?

The following typical threads that plague martial arts sites will get moved here if not just deleted: 1 - My style is better than Your style" - 2 - "Internal & External" - 3 - Personal attacks - 4 - Threads that start well, but degenerate into a spiral of nonsense.

Re: between?

Postby Tesshu on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:54 am

Yeah, let go of the ice. It's no good anyways.
My Ardbeg bottle is still closed.
4th law of Newton: To every male action there is a female overreaction.
User avatar
Tesshu
Great Old One
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Germany

Re: between?

Postby Daniel on Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:01 am

That´s not a good state for a bottle of Ardbeg. They long to be open, unorthodox.


D.

Sarcasm. Oh yeah, like that´ll work.
Daniel
Great Old One
 
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:48 am

Re: between?

Postby Tesshu on Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:34 am

So maybe we should ask about the difference "between" good and bad whisky.

This topic is TIREsome. I am at work so no whisky around.
4th law of Newton: To every male action there is a female overreaction.
User avatar
Tesshu
Great Old One
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Germany

Re: between?

Postby Andy_S on Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:51 am

Martial artists: Learn to fight but don't. Learn deadly techniques and never use them.
Sport fighters: Learn to fight and do. Don't learn deadly techniques and never use them.

The fact that sport fighters actually fight on a regular basis, against people who are actually trying to beat them, means that:
(1) They actually acquire the ability to fight or they quit and take up tennis; and
(2) Are generally fit, in modern sports terms

The fact that martial artists do not actually fight tends to mean that:
(1) While they may have endless arsenals of deadly technqiues, they don't acquire the necessary attibutes - courage, timing, durability, killer instinct etc - to make them work under pressure, so in many cases, cannot fight even if they like to think they can; and
(2) Can be highly graded and yet still be terribly out-of-shape, but may be longer-term healthier than sports fighters who build up chronic injuries, etc.

Taxi!
Services available:
Pies scoffed. Ales quaffed. Beds shat. Oiks irked. Chavs chinned. Thugs thumped. Sacks split. Arses goosed. Udders ogled. Canines consumed. Sheep shagged.Matrons outraged. Vicars enlightened. PM for rates.
User avatar
Andy_S
Great Old One
 
Posts: 7559
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 6:16 pm

Re: between?

Postby congfu on Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:20 am

like Joe say:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9L5vr3HKdE&feature=related
we are all brothers
congfu
Santi
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:06 pm

Re: between?

Postby Fubo on Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:45 am

The difference is "martial arts" is a more general label, and "martial sport" is more specific to context, but in reality I agree with Andy's general statement. A lot of so call "martial artists" (the ones that don't train their stuff in any range of sparring) art not training "martial" arts, but are training specific attributes that help specific martial arts or fighting. To say you train "martial" arts, you have to actually engaging in some range of fighting on a regular basis, be it in the context of sport, dog brothers or da streetz...
Fubo
Wuji
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:13 pm

Previous

Return to Been There Done That

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests