jaime_g wrote:since there are no clips for comparison, it might be better to talk about the "clear flaws" that you see but have not felt,
rather then about something you have felt but has not been been seen
I see same side arm-leg weighting, no use of leg bows, no central equilibrium. Dan is an entirely different beast.
That guy strikes may feel like a wall, but even I can do that (and I'm a shit). I dont feel fear from that kind of movement, if you know wrestling-grappling you have a lot of tools to deal with it, look at his lower body.
just commenting on what is posted. not about his or dans methods which there are no clips of...
he does talk about cross body alignment, central equilibrium, spirals ect. He also comments on his work vs others and has a clip showing what he's talking about.
Whether he is doing what he talks about or feels he is showing is debatable even he mentioned that on film, things dont always come through.
those in the clips seem to feel his movement are very different from what they've felt just as you mentioned about what you've felt.
Dan, has mentioned he feels its a different method. my point being that it seems to me that one can not use words to comment on something that is not shown
to compare to something that is.
I think if one wanted to comment it would be better to use a time stamp to point out what what they felt about it or feel they see, or post clips of others showing the differences they speak of.
Fear,
fear has a lot to do with the way intent is used. A person can feel fear from something that he / she has not felt physically and yet feel no fear
from something that they do feel physically.
,