Bao wrote:[ The first one, I have no real opinion about.
wiesiek wrote:let me try, :
in the 1st vid. skillz levels are close to even,
in the second one - difference is obvious, how much the teacher is good - have no idea without testing
A nice little clip of Tian Jinlong pushing hands with one of the sanda lads he coaches.
cloudz wrote:No real opinion about that of course.
But you can have an opinion on people prancing about peddling snake oil and selling bullshit under some pretence of "martial arts"- it's a cultural hobby for middle aged men, all's tickety boo.
Gotta love that.
cloudz wrote:Great demo (which is also how you would train them) of TCMA techniques here. No theatrics necessary.
Fatal Rose wrote:Why is chi blasting even open for discussion? It's proven fake garbage!
https://youtu.be/dOOh2J1b3lQ
windwalker wrote:Fatal Rose wrote:Why is chi blasting even open for discussion? It's proven fake garbage!
https://youtu.be/dOOh2J1b3lQ
quite correct, The comment could be applied to all CMA,
oops I mean only to those CMA styles/stylist its safe to apply it too.
can you post 1 clip, just 1 clip of CMA being used
as its practiced in a ring showing clear stylistic usage, as boxer
would tend to look like boxing, someone playing BJJ would tend to move and look
like they were doing BJJ...ect.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests