Rhen wrote:OH FFS "Fascia web"
dspyrido wrote:Someone explain to me why when talking about mechanics TC people cant just say knees or glutes or core? Whats wrong with using terms like leverage and angles that everyone can get? Yes there is a sensitivity component where angles and different parts of the body get engaged based on reacting to variances from what the pusher is doing but it's not magic. It's normal down to earth physics and human physiology.
wayne hansen wrote:If we banned these words it would be a lot clearer
Facia
Core
Fa Jing
Kua
Chi
Six direction
Five bows
Master
Anyone think of any more
Trick wrote:Taijiquan.......the name could be seen as to bombastic and cause a lot of discussion containing many troublesome terminology that lead to nowhere but disagreements......and becomes a room for scholars.
Peacedog wrote:As someone who has actually trained with Mark, his terminology is consistent with his system and needed to understand how to employ the system.
By combining a fair amount of meditative technology with Chinese martial arts he has a way to teach fah jing to a complete novice in as little as three days.
If anyone else on this board can do that, then I'll support whatever language you use to provide your instruction.
Peacedog wrote:By combining a fair amount of meditative technology with Chinese martial arts he has a way to teach fah jing to a complete novice in as little as three days.
When somebody says they are connecting to my "Qi" I have no idea what they mean. Equally, when they say they are "connecting to my fascia web" I also have no idea what they mean.
I know what hips, legs and elbows are though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests